The Battlefield of Love

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/crime/6808907/Honour-killing-the-legacy-of-village-life-which-killed-Tulay-Goren.html Those - xenophobes and BNP supporters perhaps - who hate the idea of foreigners coming here and importing their barbaric and nasty practices of honour - may wish to take comfort. Perhaps they will be less likely to come here in the face of predictable family strife when a family member goes native and embraces the worst aspects of Britishness . Poor Tulay Goren, the 15 year old truanting schoolgirl who got knocked up by a man twice her age - who had extra-marital sex under the age of consent. She had in fact integrated with local customs, practices and expectations. That was her tragedy.

Taoist saying: "The law is like the wind and the people the grass. When the wind blows, the grass will bend." The most evil are those who suffer it to be done in the name of liberal ideology, which permits only inaction or flabby ineffectual gestures in the name of tolerance and compassion. In short, it is our government and our political establishment which is evil in permitting evil, not discouraging it or pretending that it is not an evil. Evil is committed when educated middle class campaigners of for traditional education dare not state the obvious for fear of ostracisation and denunciation. The obvious is of course that family values are vulnerable to the depredations of female promiscuity. But female promiscuity is the Sacred Cow that the British worship. To blaspheme against the slag and slapper and the unmarried single mum will result in social death or a life worse than death, apparently. That is why emasculated men in fear of the feminazis remain silent. Nothing w...

http://www.socresonline.org.uk/11/3/macvarish.html "One interviewee described a point in her life when she felt acutely that she was not the ‘most important person to anybody’. " "Bridget’s melodramatic vision of herself dying ‘fat and alone, and found three weeks later half-eaten by Alsatians’ (Fielding, 1996) was spontaneously repeated with some seriousness by a number of the respondents, who related it to their own real experiences of being ill while living alone. These periods of sickness had forced issues of care into sharp relief, for although these were all short-lived, everyday illnesses, they had inspired visions of old age." "The idea that there has been a ‘high price of liberation’, most often articulated through the ‘myth of having it all’ are now firmly established in the discussion of female equality." " ... they risk being assessed as failures; emotionally cold or dysfunctional. " "the ‘single girl’ tag is more difficult to cl...

A promiscuous woman is analogous to a drug-dealer consuming his own stock, and therefore his own profit, at the risk of becoming an addict himself. A society that encourages this, and a government that dares not discourage this and indeed uses taxpayers' money to sponsor Free Love, is doomed to decline, barbarism and extinction.

Being a gentleman or a lady are but ideals, from which we all lapse from time to time. The quality of a person's character therefore depends on whether one knows: (1) what constitutes gentlemanly or ladylike behaviour; and (2) when one has fallen short.

http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/benedictbrogan/100018775/has-mrs-bercow-just-handed-buckingham-to-ukip/ Vote for a short Conservative male with insufferably PC views, hated by his own party, with wife who by her own admission was a bit of a slag and a slapper, taller than him, who supports the other party. Why did he let her give the interview? If he did not let her do it and she went ahead anyway, then it shows breathtaking disloyalty. That, or she may be back on the bottle again. Grounds for divorce, I would have thought. Whatever the reasons, his judgment is called into question for (a) marrying her (b) allowing her to do the interview (c) being unable to control her if she went ahead without his permission and gave it anyway despite his protestations Pussy-whipped comes to mind. Will enough people be stupid enough to vote for (and trust the judgment of) a short, pussy-whipped politician with an ex-slapper of a wife who used to be too fond of her drink? Maybe she is getting a t...

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1231756/Beefeater-sacked-harassing-female-Yeoman-tells-arrival-caused-ructions-Tower-cost-job-home.html This is a matter that continues to incense me, though I recognise that we should all have become accustomed to the shit for brains policies of the liberal establishment by now. One single woman's hurt feelings should not be put above the careers of two men with dependents in the name of equal opportunities when it is operational efficiency and the morale of the men who risk and sacrifice their lives in the Armed Forces that should be paramount. This is such a truism that it appalls me that I have to point it out again and again yet receive something that is close to blank incomprehension. Yes, I am saying that it does not matter if they disliked her for non-PC reasons. They have a right to dislike a colleague as I hope we all have a right to dislike someone and show it, however offensive that may be, provided it does not involve injury to ...

http://www.guardian.co.uk/money/2009/nov/02/tower-london-beefeaters-harassment-inquiry Who's damn stupid idea was it to have women in the Armed Forces? And why do we not have the courage to admit that it was a very stupid idea proposed by stupid people accepted by even stupider people? This goes back to my previous wall post on the subject of this country being ruled by men who are really only women with dicks - senile, scared, demented women with flaccid dicks and shit for brains. If there are any real men Beefeaters left they should down tools and go on strike, and risk being court martialled rather than put up for a moment longer with the way the Armed Forces are being run. But we know they won't because these soldiers are too scared of losing their jobs and being accused of sexism, misogyny and male chauvinist piggery. All they are fit for is to become cannon fodder in the unwinnable war of the inhabitants of Muslim lands they have invaded. Stupid is as stupid does. A US ...

The idea of the Domestic Partnership is not to negate the idea of romance but to save time and trouble. As I have said, sex and fidelity is optional and can never be the ostensible reason to enter into or dissolve such a partnership. One is therefore left with the practical social and economic reasons for forming such a partnership. If romance flutters into such a relationship, it would be a delightful extra. The conventional romantic view presupposes that romance should exist or even be manufactured and faked in order to justify such a relationship and be used to end it. It is really speed-dating for grownups. Instead of courtship you have negotiations . This saves the woman from having sex with the man on spec and the man from spending his resources on hospitality and entertainment on women merely to test drive them, so to speak. It would certainly be more economical, efficient and time-saving than conventional "romantic" methods. http://thebattlefieldoflove.blogspot.com/...

Category 1 Never Married Single Mother AKA Slut Single Mum ("SSM") She is clearly culpable for intentionally getting pregnant, recklessly getting pregnant, or negligently getting pregnant. Into this category are two subcategories. Category 1(a)  no longer has the father of her children living with her, if ever. (She is the lowest of the low.) Category 1(b) has the father of her children still living with her.  (She is not quite the lowest of the low yet . All that would need to happen is for him to walk out the door and she will become the lowest of the low.) Visit  https://www.facebook.com/pages/Should-Spinster-Single-Mothers-be-lashed-100-times/417696111659379?fref=ts to "like"this SSM Facebook group! Let us call Category 1(b) Mother of Bastard Still Living With Father of Bastard ("MOBSLWFOB" or "MOBFOB" for short) Category 2 Divorcee AKA Divorced Single Mum ("DSM") She may not be entirely to blame for her divorce...

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article6930526.ece If females are the equal of men and men hit each other, what is the problem with hitting women, reasons an adolescent boy? Adolescent females who are hit feel stupid, that is why they don't tell others, which would reinforce their self-image of being stupid. The familiarity of contempt is directly related to easy and frequent sexual access to someone's body. The woman you have screwed enough times becomes a slag and slapper, especially when she didn't need much persuading in the first place. Christine Barter of Bristol University, Senior Research Fellow for the Centre for Family Policy and Child Welfare, who spoke on the Today Programme seems utterly clueless. She is probably some unmarried lesbian academic with no contact with adolescents except when she interviews them for her research. The solution is of course to have single sex schools and to tell girls not to be slags and slappers. Parents can tell their ...

Can women have it all? Do they want it all? Or do they just want to be wives and mothers again, with husbands who work for them? The problem in the West is that the men have become useless. Not only are men in the West now just women with dicks, they are poor and stupid, accustomed to getting easy and free sex because slags and slappers give it to them sex for next to nothing. (To be fair to these slags and slappers, they are told that sex with anyone is OK as long as they use contraceptives and the person asking for sex appears respectful and polite. This is what they are more or less told at their sex education classes in British state secondary schools.) Because men are so useless, women therefore feel they have to find a career and this makes them less prepared to take any crap from men. This is what I would call Self-Reinforced Destruction. You have a problem and the action you take actually makes the overall problem worse. I think it is sort of what happened when the Millenn...

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1228710/How-David-Cameron-mashed-Turnip-Taliban.html Men are a bit slow to complain though, aren't they? Still, there are other parties for disgruntled Tories to protest vote for. Let us hope that the "Turnip Taliban" as the Metropolitan Metrosexual Tories at CCHQ call them, avail themselves of their voting options.

Richmond & Kingston Informer Friday 6 November 2009 Police hunt for train man suspected of an indecent act Police want to speak to this man [photo in report], who is suspected of committing an indecent act on a Barnes to Richmond train last month. A 21 year old woman from Barnes boarded the train at4.35pm on October 2 and noticed the man sitting opposite was staring at her throughout the journey. Investigating officer Marie Jeffrey said: "As he was nearly reached her destination, she realised the man had started indecently touching himself beneath his satchel while continuing to stare at her." The woman got off the train at Richmond, while the man is thought to have travelled to Whitton. PC Jeffrey added: "This was a very distressing incident for the victim and I am appealing for anyone who knows the man in the the picture to contact us." Anyone with information can contact the British Transport Police on 0800 40 50 40 or Crimestoppers anonymously on 0800 555 11...

I wonder what the BNP will say about single mummery in their manifesto. Perhaps they will not even address the question in their manifesto for fear of alienating their own potential supporters, knowing of the tendency of the white proletariat to be illegitimate and their women to be single mums. The white urban proletariat do not value education because the welfare state always provides and so don't mind sending their children to crap schools, which teach them nothing that would make them employable. MPs and the liberal establishment, who do not have to send their children to crap comps, do not care about these people and will do nothing to address their education and training because it is more trouble than their job's worth. Not only do the white urban proletariat suffer the problems of promiscuity, intoxication, single mummery, illegitimacy, pornography, divorce, paedophilia, low-achievement and whingeing victimhood, they find themselves on the receiving end of the contemp...

http://search.japantimes.co.jp/mail/nn20091103i1.html shows that the Japanese are declining too, even though they have a vastly different culture, are quite authoritarian and have virtually no immigrants. Becoming a single mum there would turn you into a social pariah - and quite right too - so instead of having a problem of illegitimacy as we do in the West, they have a problem of not having enough children. Well, the Chinese, when the current lot ages, will be having the same problem too, but in spades and shovelfuls. Perhaps the Japanese need a spot of immigration to refresh their society. Or perhaps war will make men men and women women again, who seek partnerships with each other for sex, protection and provision and invest in their future by having biddable high-achieving children. Perhaps a bit of adversity is what is required and more than a bit of adversity is on its way, not just for the Japanese, but for all of us. What does not kill us makes us stronger.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/earth/hi/earth_news/newsid_8318000/8318182.stm The female whale basically gets the males to pursue her. The ones who keep up with her get to mate with her, because he would be swiftest and strongest and most likely to have healthy offspring than the slower ones who couldn't keep up with her. At the very least a male should be able to keep up with a female in property, intellect or strength, or there is just no point. This is obviously not rocket science, but tragically beyond the comprehension of the average unmarried single mum, who never heard of evolutionary psychology before getting herself knocked up. Something lacking, then, in their sex education classes where they hand out contraceptives like sweets to eager children. All the more reason to abolish the welfare state, because it is even now lowering the quality of the next generation's genetic inheritance. In case you didn't know, the average Briton is infamous for his/her stupidity...

I am now addressing my mind to the question of marital rape now that I have discovered this is a question that is exercising Singaporeans. While it is only humane to formally proclaim that a wife is not her husband's to treat as his sex slave, surely she must also be obliged to give him reasonable access? It is therefore arguably unnecessary to have such a law, because if he rapes her regularly she would divorce him or run away, and if she gives him no sexual access whatseover he will seek sex elsewhere, thus jeopardising if not actually terminating the marriage. In practice it is hardly ever invoked and was always meant as a sop to the feminists. http://www.straitstimes.com/Breaking+News/Singapore/Story/STIStory_405235.html

"The feminist revolution has been powered by male greed - for sex, money, and irresponsibility", says an anti-feminist. I would add that the feminist revolution has also been driven by the stupidity of and promiscuity of women. Stupid because they have been persuaded that being promiscuous would be good for them. Some of them probably behave promiscuously, not because they even want to, but because they must to fit in and be one of the girls. Typically, those who are now single mums can only whinge on about how hard it is to find another man and make ends meet. Instead of bailing these women out with yet more benefits, why don't we let them sink under their own weight of stupidity and promiscuity. It would be cheaper and far more effective. It is the only language they understand, or they will carry on getting knocked up by their low-life men and then whinge when they have to lie in their own badly-made beds. Marry in haste repent at leisure. Become ...

Prostitutes at least have the virtue of making men know that if they cannot get sex from a girlfriend or a wife they must pay for it, and that there is no such thing as a free lunch. The truth is that these men cannot get it for "free" from a woman because they are basically low-status men who are obviously not good husband and father material. Or if they are already married, they are unfortunate in not finding what they have sexually adequate or are insatiably depraved. Paying for a prostitute reinforces the lower status of these men and sends a message to other men that they must up their game if they want their own woman in their own home. I would also like to make unmarried mothers acknowledged to be of a lower status than prostitutes, because they are too stupid to even ask for payment. Allowing a man who cares nothing for you to impregnate you and then leave you holding the baby suggests just a bit of culpable stupidity, does it not? A prostitute at least has the sense...

http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/womanshour/04/2009_43_fri.shtml Love letters by women to men: pleading, planning, warning, bargaining and ultimately disappointingly banal. As for poetry, I am afraid the awful truth, gentlemen, is that women are more likely to write love poems to each other than to a man. A man would be embarrassed to receive one and wouldn't know how to respond, particularly if it was very good. The woman would be perceived to have demeaned herself in taking so much trouble over a mere man, and so it would be better for her if she could pass it off as a doggerel written in jest in an idle moment. When a man writes poetry for a woman, and means it, it is invariably suffused with heroic metaphors, either that, or written in the tone of a conqueror enslaved. "Do love letters written by men differ in style, sentiment and sincerity to those written by women?" You betcha. Much as I love Peter Mandelson, I have never felt the urge to express it in poetry. My lov...

From The Week - 17.10.09 Why women love Orlando Bloom The advent of the contraceptive pill, which became available on the NHS in the late 1960s, ushered in an era of sexual liberation and gave women, for the first time in history, control over their fertility. What it may also have done, according to a report in Scientific American on research done by scientists at Sheffield University, is alter women's taste in men. In a normal menstrual cycle, the scientists found, the hormonal changes occur around the time of ovulation tend to make women more attracted to rugged, manly men - that is to say those who, being genetically dissimilar to them, are more likely to father healthy children. The pill, however, suppresses this process, with the result that women start to prefer more sensitive-looking types (as they do ordinarily, at other times of the month) and those who are genetically more similar to them. Some commentators have speculated that this may in part account for the eff...

As a Libertarian, I am all for the legalisation of prostitution. This being so, prostitutes should be allowed to work in brothels for their own safety. Brothel-keeping is however illegal in this country. The English Collective of Prostitutes http://www.prostitutescollective.net/ are campaigning for brothel-keeping to be legal, yet are strangely welcoming and tolerant of foreign hookers who come here and take the bread out of their mouths, lowering the prices in the same way that foreign competition from plumbers, workmen etc would lower wages for locals. Perhaps this strangely contradictory position is something that is typically female. If I were an English prostitute I wouldn't be welcoming the competition, but perhaps it is a feminist sisterhood thing. The government's desire to criminalise men who have transacted with women who turn out to have been "trafficked" may perhaps be some sneaky attempt by the government at immigration control. Traffick...

http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/womanshour/02/2009_43_fri.shtml A new type of 'family'. A new trend is emerging among single parents to advertise on the internet in order to set up flat shares with each other. The appeal of such an arrangement is to offer both single parent and child an expanded family set up in better accommodation than they would be able to afford otherwise. But economic advantage aside, is it a good idea? To discuss, Jenni is joined by Maria Roberts, author of ‘Single Mother on the Verge’ who is a supporter of such schemes and by psychologist Dr. Richard Woolfson . ‘Single Mother On The Verge’ by Maria Roberts is published by Penguin ISBN - 10: 0141037776 Another toxic destructive idea dreamt up by these depraved single mothers who are now increasing in number exponentially? Surely, but surely, it is a recipe for paedophilia, under aged sex, unwanted teenage pregnancy, child abuse and childhood traumas? It will all go wrong and then they will want taxpayers...

Are men naturally non-interventionists and women naturally censorious and interfering? Is our nanny state the result of feminine values predominating and a national manifestation of feminine neurosis and irrationality? Is Western civilisation doomed if it does not address this problem? Surely it must pull itself back into masculine preoccupations of analysis and rational problem-solving as opposed to feminine displacement activity? History is replete with patriarchies while matriarchies are unheard of. Is it because matriarchies are by definition incapable of practising anything as civilised as reading and writing, because its natural state is simply breeding, emotionalism and barbarism? The refusal to address the problem of single mummery is the chief reason why we have ever-declining educational standards which successive governments are too frightened to address for fear of giving offence to the illegitimate and the mothers of the illegitimate, and of course the female-dominated tea...

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/london/8316646.stm Why has gay bashing risen by 20% in London, ie in the Tower Hamlets - a predominantly Muslim area? Is it because the Muslims (whose Koran informs them that homosexual acts are sinful) are beating up gays more than any other group? Is it anything to do with the increasingly militancy of homosexuals and how they are perceived to be a sort of gay mafia taking over the country and given special privileges, and the "gayer than Labour" message the Tories are trying to give? http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2009/10/nick-boles-tory-ppc-foisted-on-grantham.html When two groups protected by PC legislation are in conflict with each other, who wins? Hate Crime ( ie assaulting or killing someone because you hate them) attracts a higher penalty than if you did not particularly hate them. Why on earth would you attack or kill someone if you did not hate them? So, attacking a homosexual, disabled person or someone on religious ...

http://www.guardian.co.uk/lifeandstyle/2009/oct/27/downs-syndrome-babies-motherhood I would rather commit infanticide and put my hands up for it, just like the attention-seeking euthanasing travellers to Switzerland do, than 1) have an abortion 2) bring up a mentally handicapped child 3) inflict my mentally handicapped child on the taxpayer Would my proposed course of action not make sense if you were one of those older mothers who may not have the chance to conceive again? The advantage of my recommended course of action are: 1) I could enjoy my pregnancy. 2) I wouldn't be living with the guilt of perhaps needlessly aborting a child that turns out to be healthy after all. 3) I can always deal with the mentally handicapped baby discreetly after it is born. I have been careful to explain my moral reasoning in case there is anyone reading this who could find herself in this position or is already in this position. Don't have the test and don't have the abortion. Deal with it...

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/healthnews/6440042/Increasing-number-of-women-being-diagnosed-with-Downs-syndrome-babies.html The answer to this problem is simple. Create a situation where women see it as an advantage to have children younger, and in wedlock too. This is of course beyond the wit of the liberal establishment. They of course prefer to wring their hands at the increase of single mummery, family breakdown, rising crime, ever-lowering standards of education and behaviour, make us pay paedophile and green taxes and rejecting any solution that might work because it might seem judgemental, intolerant and insufficiently compassionate. Perhaps it is time they were sent on their way after so many decades in power.

Dear Lord Mandelson CLAUSES ON PROSTITUTION IN THE POLICING AND CRIME BILL I strongly oppose clauses on prostitution in the Policing and Crime Bill 2009 which would: make it easier for the police to arrest women for “loitering and soliciting”; extend “closure orders” against sex workers’ premises; introduce compulsory “rehabilitation” of sex workers under threat of imprisonment; arrest presumed kerb-crawlers on a first offence; introduce a strict liability offence of “paying for sexual services of a prostitute subjected to force” (i.e. no need to show knowledge or recklessness); extend powers to search, seize and retain property under Proceeds of Crime legislation. If these proposals become law, they will increase criminalisation and imprisonment, particularly of women, and push prostitution further underground, putting sex workers more at risk of violence. These measures should be withdrawn. I urge you to speak and vote against them when they come to the Lords. Having laws that would ...

http://www.xing.com/net/china/-business-and-economics-of-hongkong-wirtschaft-hongkong-2428/have-hk-girls-stopped-looking-for-mr-white-798553/ Is that because he has been credit crunched and Chinese men now have more money?

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-1220756/A-strange-lonely-troubling-death--.html "The strange, lonely and troubling death of Stephen Gately ": why can't Jan Moir say this without being denounced? Are gays God now? Is being unflattering about a dead gay man and his partner who was enjoying himself with another, tantamount to blasphemy in our age of liberal extremism? If a straight man was enjoying himself with another woman while his wife lay dead in the bedroom, we would be allowed to speculate on the morals of the deceased and his wife, would we not? If a straight woman was enjoying himself with another man while her husband lay dead in the bedroom, we would be allowed to speculate on the morals of the deceased her husband, would we not? Why are gay people treated with kid gloves these days? This could be yet another sign of liberal dementia.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/tv-and-radio/2009/oct/15/home-grown http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b00n58ct But that's no surprise. Non-Asian British men also want wives uninfected by feminism and frequently go to the Far East or Eastern Europe to shop for their brides, those of them who can afford to. Perhaps I should start a Stepford Wives Academy so local women also get a look-in?

Join www.1party4all.co.uk and get your lottery numbers from a dream you had last night. New and unique number-generating system! Join quoting this offer with your dream and you will be given 6 numbers based on the dream you had last night. Guaranteed to make your next lottery-buying experience more enjoyable!

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/africa/article6871900.ece Facebook users clicking on this link will see this message. "The link you are trying to visit has been reported as abusive by Facebook users." It is insane! Why is it offensive? Who finds it offensive? Africans? Chinese? White supremacists? If so, what business is it of theirs??

http://roissy.wordpress.com/2009/10/06/feminism-as-sexual-selection-strategy/ This is done by being masculine while parroting feminist principles as if he believed in them to lull her into a false sense of security that she is dealing with a New (and feminist-submissive) Man. He would get the woman to give him sexual access to her body while making her pay her share for everything. He would make sure that he becomes the househusband while sending his woman out to work. When she whinges about this, he can say, in an aggrieved tone of voice: "But, darling, I thought you believed in gender equality." He can then point out to her that she earns more than he does anyway, so it wouldn't make sense for him to go out and her to stay home. When she finally has enough and divorces him, he can take her to the cleaners. To do this as a career option, all you have to do is be very good in bed and understand her moods. In short, beat women at their own game.

http://search.japantimes.co.jp/cgi-bin/fl20090510x1.html • They are not as competitively minded about their jobs as men in older generations. • They are fashion conscious and eat sparingly so they can stay thin and fit into skintight clothes. • They are chummy with their moms and often go shopping together. • They are not interested in dating girls, having relationships, or even having sex (choosing from a plethora of "self-help" toys instead). • They are very tight with their money and often carry several retailers' "point cards" around, declaring that those who don't pinch pennies are stupid. Ushikubo has even gone so far as giving these types a new label: ojo-man (ladylike men). "Many of the boys I've met told me they cannot go out of their house if their hair doesn't look perfect," she said. "They have also told me that their self-esteem goes up when their nails look nice." Ushikubo estimates that 60 percent of today's men...

http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2009/aug/28/tories-gay-rainbow-logo (In my most strident Glenda Slagg mode): Doncha hate the way the Tories are sucking up to gay and lesbian community???"!!! As well as the idiotic broccoli logo we now have this stupid rainbow which is intended to appeal to the kiddywinx we have all been dumbed down to, I suppose. If I were Tory Party leader I would offer to simultaneously promise to abolish Inheritance Tax and the civil partnership. They should be tolerated but are not the equal of couples who enter a supposedly life-long commitment to bring up the next generation. The Koran deals very wisely with the question of tolerance without conferring equality. http://thebattlefieldoflove.blogspot.com/2008/06/male-priests-civil-partnership-blessed.html

http://www.guardian.co.uk/tv-and-radio/tvandradioblog/2009/oct/05/bbc-licence-fee-criminal-justice To address the problem of spousal exploitation, I would pass a law requiring all couples to sign up a marriage contract before a marriage is legally recognised by law. For any contract to be valid, a mediator or an odd number of mediators would have to be appointed by the couple. This is to enable one of them to complain about the unreasonable behaviour of the other, before getting to the end of their tether and resorting to knifing their husbands. The wife can then ring her mediator and say: "He insists on buggering me every time we have sex. I don't enjoy it and I have had enough. Nowhere does it say in our marriage contract that a conjugal obligation exists on my part to submit to this disgusting and perverted practice. Could you have a word with him, please?"

This summary is not available. Please click here to view the post.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2009/sep/28/hpv-cervical-cancer-vaccine-death Is there a moral to be extracted from this story? That girls who are looking forward to having lots of sex should beware? That those who think they can avoid the consequences of promiscuity should beware? I was dead against this unasked for a drug that nobody asked for which would only have encouraged promiscuity in women thinking that they would be protected after taking it. The taxpayer would be paying for this and the manufacturers of this drug would get the money. Our daughters will be harmed by becoming sexually active at an ever-earlier age, more men would be accused of paedophilia, and relations poisoned between men and women, adult and child. The harm of starting sex early is that a young girl 1) thinks it is acceptable to use sex as a way of attracting attention 2) would be more vulnerable to unwanted pregnancy 3) would be more vulnerable to exploitation 4) is on the road to casual sex as a lifestyle ch...

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-1215464/Why-I-loathe-feminism---believe-ultimately-destroy-family.html This country is now on the brink of serious moral collapse. We must stop demonising men and start healing the rift that feminism has created between men and women. Harriet Harman's insidious and manipulative philosophy that women are always victims and men always oppressors can only continue this unspeakable cycle of violence. And it's our children who will suffer. Should women also loathe feminism? After all, it hasn't made them happier, has it?

http://fathersforlife.org/pizzey/anti_fem.htm "What we have left, thanks to this evil movement, is a vast number of lone women trying to keep what is left of family life going. They never asked to be foot soldiers in what has become a feminazi army. They were not blessed with skills and college degrees that gave them economic power to make decisions when they were abandoned by their men. They believed that the feminist movement was going to offer them choices. What they did not understand was that there were never any choices. Men, realizing that they had been cast in the role of sexual monsters, retaliated. Those that didn't pitch into the war of the sexes with relish, simply faded away. Women facing the new millennium have few choices. One of them must be to take back our homes and our families from the clutch of the feminist movement." Women need to speak out against feminism , but are they too stupid and cowardly to do so? Too busy at work? Too busy neglecting...

Women like to fuss and this means big government. Men like to get on with the important things of life and prefer small government. The more work women take on, the more they whinge and fuss, the higher their status. The less men are bogged down by detail through good husbandry, the more likely they are to get on with important things, like reasoning and debating. Women like and want to be part of the nanny state. Real men prefer small government. Women have puritanical traits, men libertarian traits. Which is to be preferred?

http://www.dadsnow.org/essay/PIZZEY1.HTM Feminism is the Trojan horse that Marx built to destroy Western civilisation.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/worldnews/article-1210169/Frank-Evans-Bull-fighting-age-67-return-El-Ingles--Britains-oldest-matador.html Perhaps introducing bullfighting may save the parlous state of British masculinity from total emasculation. It is just a thought. Am I weird in finding the whole thing rather sexy? The strutting, the preening, the tight clothes, the suit of lights, the courage, the danger and the death .... It is after all a celebration of masculinity. Much more controlled than football hooliganism or Far Right and Muslim fights outside mosques in the Midlands .... No doubt the women and the girlymen will forbid it. It is of course unBritish , but it could become British, if there is a will, and a masculine way at that! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bullfighting has a few pointers about the different kinds of bullfighting. I am a bit of a purist and favour the Spanish-style bullfight.

Women are mostly in the dishonourable position of wishing to wound but afraid to strike. This was how Michael Portillo described himself when he could have made a bid for the leadership of the Conservative Party, when his courage failed him. Women judge but do not condemn and rarely have the courage of their own convictions. They also have a horror of making fools of themselves or sticking their head above the parapet. Most of them like hanging on to their sense of virtue while getting men to do their dirty work, such as taking the rubbish out, dealing with intruders, bringing home the bacon, and squashing that bug. Have our political classes taken on the worst vices of women unbeknownst to us? Are they behaving like a neurotic and feeble-minded old nanny suffering from Alzheimers who has not yet quite got round to telling her charges, now all well over 21, that Santa Claus does not in fact exist? She fears that they will be first disappointed to learn of his non-existence and t...

http://www.metro.co.uk/news/article.html?Volunteer_parents_face_paedophile_check&in_article_id=736326&in_page_id=34 David Alexander Hough a Labour-supporting teacher in Essex opined on Facebook that if teachers had to have CRB checks, then school visitors such as writers should be subjected to the same indignity, in order to pursue his twisted idea of equal opportunities government persecution.  David Alexander Hough is a very Politically Correct Man indeed. The most important thing for him was that something must be seen to be done , even if it will do no one any good, for the sake of the kiddywinks ... If this isn't feminine dementia contracted by men, then I don't know what is. 

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/8242870.stm Women judge, but do they convict? The answer, it seems, is that they judge but do not convict. What are we to make of this? Typical woman: in the dishonourable position of wishing to wound, but afraid to strike. Vacillating, irrational, hypocritical frightened women, who rarely have the courage of their convictions, in case they offend against their own sex by seeming harsh, judgemental and uncompassionate . After all, they prefer to let someone else - men - pick up the pieces and do their dirty work, eg squashing that bug, pulling the trigger etc, after they have wasted everyone's time and allowed more time for things to get worse while they fuss with their hair, fix their nails, look in the mirror, dither about and examine the contents of their handbag ....

http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2009/sep/06/children-babies-parents-care-barnardos Barnardo's is of the opinion that removing potentially feral children from obviously unfit parents early would save a few lives and the general public from being upset by more scummy never-married mummies with scummy boyfriends who kill their children, or scummy parents who bring up scummy children who kill and torture other people's children for their amusement and entertainment. Why does the government not take this idea to its logical conclusion and discourage the reproductive choices of sluts, slags and slappers? The withdrawal of universal child benefit would be a start. These women, though uneducated, are not completely stupid and will know on which side of their bread is buttered. They will soon stop indulging their low-life tastes if they know there is no financial reward in a lifetime of unmarried parenthood bringing up their variously-fathered feral children at taxpayer expense. Educ...

http://www.chdt.org.uk/Discover/Historic_Warships/Historic_Warships.html I do believe Britain will now be entirely at the mercy of its enemies. I was at Chatham Docks yesterday and saw a group of about ten naval cadets and noticed that at least three were female. Rage, disgust, horror and an inevitable sense of helplessness engulfed me. They already have a well-established reputation for getting knocked up and then complaining about sex discrimination and harassment. Is there no escaping this contagion of feminism even in the Queen's Navy? They are also weaker, dimmer and tend to rely on the natural gallantry of men to help them lift heavy objects and do mental arithmetic. Or else they rely on the confined spaces and close living quarters to stir red-blooded men into a understandable frenzy of sexual frustration so they can feel more attractive and powerful than they might otherwise be on dry land, when men have the luxury of choice. Either way, the effect of it is t...

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1210925/Schoolboy-torturers-left-young-boys-fighting-life-sickening-sex-assault-beatings.html If we tolerate this for much longer, we deserve all that is coming to us, don't we? Perhaps we need more stories like this before we will unequivocably condemn single mummery. If so, then let us wait for the next one. It will not be too long in coming. And the next one and the next one, before those who presume to govern us will do something about the growing number of little bastards who torture and kill other people's children for fun.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/apr/02/david-starkey-henry-viii They probably do, though I haven't read any books by any female historians lately. Western society is now morbidly over-feminised, with the worst aspects of the feminine character now manifesting itself: social cowardice, excessive emotionalism, an inability to reason and worst of all, masochism and victimhood. We now have our Foreign Secretary emoting about how angry, upset and distressed he is by the behaviour of another country and must now be the laughing stock of the world, who will be picturing the British gathering up their skirts in indignation, flouncing off the world stage and slamming the door. Let us have no more of this stupid girly stuff! Perhaps we need homosexual men like David Starkey and Peter Mandelson (who are not vulnerable to the crushing toxicity of feminism or in danger of his wife threatening to divorce him and take half his stuff at the drop of a hat) to tell it like it is. Of cou...

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/columnists/article-531289/Sorry-I-blame-Scarlett-Keelings-mother.html http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Death_of_Baby_P http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/scotland/article6802106.ece http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/crime/6117499/Girl-found-dead-in-lorry-drivers-cab-named-as-Stacey-Lawrence.html No doubt the rest of the world thinks that the average Briton is some promiscuous single mother who will be entrusting her child to some scummy drug-addicted paedophile boyfriend who will kill it after sexually assaulting it. Fiona McKeown was the first in this series of typical British mums now internationally infamous. Then there was Baby P's mother. Then the Dundee case. Now the lorrydriver boyfriend with a history of domestic violence who hanged himself. (His girlfriend's 9 year old daughter was found strangled in his cab.) While it is no skin off my nose that these people use their children as a means of acquiring more benefits from the sta...

Just spoke to a friend who was telling me about his phobia of the dentists and his unexpectedly pleasant recent experience with a female dentist whose cleavage he was enthusiastically describing to me. I remarked that the sight of it must have been very calming and undoubtedly helped take his mind off things. He wants to go back now, more often than is in fact necessary. I think he has been "groomed". I think women are groomed too. A very attractive dental hygienist (who necessarily gets her work from regularly returning patients) would rest her bosom against my face as she worked on my gnashers . Yes, guys, it was very nice indeed. My emotions were that of surprise and a certain amount of gratified pleasure. "Do you really fancy me or do you really not know you are doing this?" I wondered . Of course you would never dream of saying anything, because that would ruin everything. That is how they get you to come back again and again to wonder again and again .... It i...

http://dontmarry.wordpress.com/ http://weddedabyss.wordpress.com/ Should women go on sex strike? Would this situation, ignored in the short, medium and long term, be in effect geno -suicide? Do you think the government will do anything about this or sweep it under the carpet until we all die off like dodos? (This would mean tackling feminism, overhauling the family courts, having confrontations and controversy - all the things our political classes dread.) Which is the more likely scenario, would you say, dear reader? Yet another male marriage strike link tells me that things are looking very bad, even for much younger and far more attractive women than I. Soon, we will all be forced to become Muslims to get a man to actually marry us and then be forced to share him with the others. I wouldn't mind in principle, if I got along with his other wives, but it is not everyone's cup of tea, is it? Islamic state, anyone?