Thursday, 29 December 2011

A "one-parent family" (oxymoronic PC claptrap) is not a family at all, but a slut with variously-fathered illegitimate (probably feral) offspring who will be a burden on the taxpayer

One-parent families on the rise

Britons are increasingly likely to live in single-parent families, 

stay at home for longer, marry later and struggle to afford a house, 
official figures show.
Two-parent households are becoming less common

Why are the men of Britain silent about what is happening to the next generation and their nation?

They are standing silently by while the feminists desecrate the institutions of marriage and family.

Even the BNP, who ought to know better and should have rudimentary grasp of the rules of racial health and hygiene, are silent about this, because they fear to offend most of their members who are themselves bastards or fathers of bastards who impregnated SSMs.
Nation of Disabled Sluts and Bastards, cursed by God - Deuteronomy 28:44

Is it because they have had their cocks cut off by the feminists and stuffed into their mouths to keep them quiet?

Friday, 23 December 2011

Helen Gurley Brown's Sex and the Single Girl

How odd that Sex and the Single Girl - a book encouraging single women to have extramarital sex - was in fact written by a married woman.

Didn't these feminists know that advice from such a woman would be suspect?  Feminists are very silly women and what they do and say should be drowned in a very large pile of salt.   Sadly, however, men these days doff their caps to them and pull their forelocks, obeying their orders and destroying their own civilisation, for the moral corruption of tolerating female promiscuity (and consequently widespread bastardy) will also destroy the masculinity and the honour of the men and with it the quality of the next generation who will consist mostly of sluts and bastards and women who do it Accidentally On Purpose like Mary F Pols.

Are there any women who are single and don't want to be?  Yes, I ask this question of every single and looking woman for whom it is now too late to find a decent man because they became extinct a long time ago to mock them for their stupidity.   Did you really think you could have it all, you stupid cow?  

Perhaps, like Hess, her grave will be desecrated when she is dead, by disillusioned feminists and sluts who have fucked up their lives.

Thursday, 15 December 2011

For "problem families" read "one-parent families" headed by Slut Single Mums

Sell them abroad as slaves if they don't shape up? Will anyone want to buy them though? I am reminded of the curse in Deuteronomy verse 43.

Or shoot the bastards (and they will mostly be bastards). 3 strikes and you're dead.  Quick and cheap.

Sex Offender Language AKA Date Rape Language

The language used in ‘lads magazines’ is often accused of being inflammatory. But now a new study claims it is even more extreme than the language used by sex offenders. The study mixed quotes from four of the most popular lads magazines with quotes taken from interviews with convicted rapists, and asked a sample of men which attitudes they most identified with. Most of the participants identified more with the rapists’ quotes than the lads’ magazines quotes. When magazines are widely recognised as being adolescents’ favoured source of sexual information, what is the message the young men in question are receiving? Psychologist Dr Miranda Horvath, who co-authored the study, joins Piers Hernu - men’s magazine writer and former Editor at Large of FHM – to discuss sexualised language in lads mags and beyond.

How sad that women these days need to be told that men are easily inflamed these days, especially with all that free porn they get on the Internet and the way women these days go about wearing their underwear in public.

When someone is easily inflamed, do you inflame them some more by provocative dress and behaviour, or tone it down?

The answer of a reasonable woman would be "NO, I would tone it down."

The orthodox modern feminist answer, however, is "YES, I have the right to dress like a slut and not be raped,  so, er, fuck them!" -  surprise, surprise!

If you inflame them some more, should you not take responsibility for your actions, in the same way that you should take some blame for leaving your home unsecured while you go away for the weekend?

Obviously not, if you are a modern feminist who believes that women are moral and intellectual retards who cannot be expected to take any responsibility for their actions when they complain about date rape.

Woman's Hour has blocked me from following "her" tweets

That really is quite an achievement.   I must thank Jane Garvey and Dame Jenni for giving me this rare distinction.  

Violence can only mean PHYSICAL violence but there is a matriarchal conspiracy to persuade stupid cunt Brits that ain't so

Men accused of ‘bullying or abusing’ their wives could face criminal charges under new domestic violence laws.

Read more:

It is of course a demented cuntish liberal feminist conspiracy to

  1. make marriage more unpopular
  2. make family break-up more likely
  3. deprive parents of parental authority
  4. deprive men of masculine authority
  5. fuck up the next generation
  6. fuck up your country even more than it is already
  7. and then turn it over fuck it up the ARSE
so we can all go to hell in our handcart FASTER.

Are you a degenerate stupid cunt British MALE MP who is going to take this lying down?

Of course you are, of course you are, you stupid fucking CUNT degenerate piece of effeminate SHIT with a dick attached to you.   

Tuesday, 13 December 2011

Why the matriarchy is mad and feminism fucks you up. She may not mean to but she does.

"Based on past history, it appears that a civilization that embraces feminist values will cease to exist in just a few centuries. This is why we have never seen a feminist civilization aside from very short spans at the end of the Roman empire and possibly a few other more ancient civilizations."

"1-2 century AD: The family unit is destroyed. Men refuse to marry and the government tries to revive marriage with a "bachelor tax", to no avail. Children are growing up without fathers, Roman women show little interest in raising their own children and frequently use nannies. The wealth and power of women grows very fast, while men become increasingly demotivated and engage in prostitution and vice. Prostitution and homosexuality become widespread."

Saturday, 10 December 2011

Why sluts are stupid

Woman asks:

'If I sleep with 3 men, everyone calls me a slut.  But when a man sleeps with 8 girls, everyone calls him a real man.  How come?'

Wise man replies:

'It's very simple. When one lock can be opened by 3 different keys, it's a bad lock. But when one key can open 8 different locks, we call it a master key'.

Monday, 5 December 2011

People with nut allergies

I can't stand people with nut allergies.   Extermination's too good for them.  

Monday, 28 November 2011

Feminism to blame for Political Correctness and Multiculturalism, yet dumb dumb BNP are still chasing the female vote and afraid of offending SSMs

"the degree of a nation or society's embrace of Multiculturalism and PC is related directly to the amount of equality and even social superiority between women, on the one hand, and men on the other. That the more most women are equal or slightly superior to most men, the more the society will broadly embrace PC and Multiculturalism. And that further, the more the ELITES are equal among genders, or women elites are slightly superior to most (but not all) male elites, the more the elites will whole-heartedly embrace Multiculturalism and PC."

‎"Women are hard-wired to crave dominance. Need it, want, do anything for it. Including import lots of dominant Muslim men, in the hope of transforming the nation into a place filled with dominant, sexy A-holes that women crave."

"Sweden is importing basically, Muslim bad boys, making excuses for rapes and assaults, embracing PC, and loathing its history, culture, and values, because it is run in the main part to appeal to women (if not run by them directly) and there is nothing Women in the West HATE HATE HATE more than a Beta male. Or a Beta Male society. It wasn't always so, but it is today."

Yes, women hate betas for not being alphas. It is racially TRAGIC then that most white men were never told by their useless slut single mums or by their absent fathers that they should make something of themselves or no decent woman is ever going to give them the time of day.

Even the ugliest man will get his end away if he has money to throw around.

Blame it on the welfare state you are all so mollycoddled by then.

Oh yeah, and your cheap cheap women.

Why the white man is now too stupid to understand and too gutless to challenge his women explains how men have let the genie out of the bottle by condoning female promiscuity, and have in effect sealed their doom. Nothing short of a revolution can now overthrow the matriarchy, which these emasculated, effeminate and atheist white men no longer have the stomach to do.

Why the white working class is like the man in The Beach who got bitten by a shark

So the white working classes think the government is shutting them up by calling them racist every time they complain about immigration.

This is of course common knowledge in nationalist circles.   Remember how ex-Prime Minister Gordon Brown described Mrs Gillian Duffy, a life-long Labour supporter as "that bigoted woman" when she complained about immigration?

Those who complain about immigration are the party poopers of liberalism.  They are rather like the man who got bitten by the shark in The Beach.  The story is about a hippy community on a paradise island led by an Sal, an older woman, whose purpose is to keep the community undiscovered by the outside world.

When the unfortunate Christo got bitten, he did not recover but instead moaned and groaned so demoralisingly and piteously that this community that was supposed to be based on love and mutual respect for each other could not bear his cries of pain any more and took him to the middle of the jungle to die.

And then they partied on.

His life could have been saved by calling for medical assistance but that would have spoiled their fun, so Sal (played by Tilda Swinton) would rather this dispensable man die to avoid inconvenience to herself and her hippy paradise island community.

Sal represents the matriarchy and Christo, the dispensable beta male whom she thinks is not worth curing, certainly not at her expense and inconvenience, is analogous to the white no longer working classes.

White Man! Know thyself and know thine enemy.

Saturday, 26 November 2011

Post hoc ergo propter hoc

I wonder how many are familiar with this Latin expression, which means getting the wrong end of the stick.

How terribly sad if the poor nations should look to the West and think,

"Oh, look: they have money and they are mostly sluts and bastards who screw around when they are under-aged, become syphilitic in their teens and have variously-fathered feral bastards who will become the next generations of criminals and looters.  When more bastards are born than legitimate babies, the politicians are too afraid to condemn the sluts of bastards, because there are so many of them.  Let us do like they do and become wealthy and powerful like them."


All who wish UKIP to admit me should write to

Steve Harris



The Old Grain Store

Church Lane


West Sussex

BN17 7 QJ

and say why, before the end of the year.


  1. I used to be a member of UKIP.
  2. My Eurosceptic credentials are impeccable.
  3. I was one of Bill Cash MP’s volunteers during the passage of the Maastricht Bill through the House of Lords at Committee Stage.
  4. I may have said controversial things but never anything racist, for I believe any apparent differences between the races have their roots in environment and culture rather than race and genetics.
  5. The fact that I am non-white should attract non-white voters to UKIP.
  6. I am known to the Muslims and they are by no means hostile even though they are aware of past association with the BNP.    
  7. My association with the BNP would help to attract more members to the UKIP, which would be a good thing because it would show that UKIP are not the PC cowards they are who bore and frustrate voters by their fear of being accused of racism. 
  8. My legal training would be useful to UKIP.
  9. My communication skills would be useful to UKIP, particularly in my capacity as Press Officer or Director of Communications.
  10. The fact that I am controversial would attract publicity for UKIP.  All publicity is good publicity, if managed skilfully.
  11. I have a coherent and worked-out ideology as well as a political strategy on how the Eurosceptic parties can best collaborate to inflict maximum damage on the LibLabCon.
  12. While I am aware that there will be UKIP members who will object to my admission, they will not be able to prove that I am racist or cite anything racist I may have said.   Their objections are in any case personal (because I have offended them) or personal ambition (how they would hate to see me benefit from having the courage to tell the truth as I see it, instead of cowering and cringing like them with ambiguous non-committal pronouncements designed to avoid giving offence to those who should be criticised) or rooted in an irrational fear of being associated with someone associated with a party known to be “racist”.  
  13. I may be able to persuade other experienced and prominent members of the BNP to join UKIP which would demoralize what is left of the BNP, causing yet more defections.
  14. I have devised a method of cleansing such ex-BNP members of the taint of racism.
  15. I have devised a Code of Conduct for Members which I believe would make relations between members more co-operative and comradely.  
  16. The prohibition against ex-BNP members joining UKIP is in any case ultra vires.
  17. The only reason to NOT admit me is if you really think UKIP would have fewer votes because I am a member, and that is most unlikely, as I am now already known for thinking the unthinkable, saying the unsayable, telling the truth as I see it and having perfect command of all my arguments.   
  18. Foreign-born though I am, non-white though I am, I speak for the British better than the indigenous British politicians can speak for the British, and I am not afraid to say what needs to be said, without fear of favour.  If you listen carefully you will hear, up and down the nation, the liberals quaking in their boots and the Vampire of Feminism hissing with rage, for she fears the light of Truth and the revelation of Reason that will demonstrate her dementia, incompetence and the unwarranted burden she places on this country by condoning and sponsoring widespread illegitimacy, whose talents she wastes and whose wealth she squanders on her useless projects to demonstrate her status - the status of being so privileged she is far removed from reality and can defy common sense - and her endless indiscriminate nauseating stinking toxic discharge of compassion and tolerance of all that is evil and destructive in society.  Let us now drive a stake through her heart, before night falls again .....

Why women who cannot take the heat of politics should stay in the kitchen

In politics, even the truths you think are self-evident are regarded  as lunatic nonsense by your enemies, who will mock, abuse and slander you.

Those who want to be chefs and then complain about the heat making their faces shine are not made of the right stuff.

Women will always have their chastity, appearance, sanity as well as their political views derided, so they need to be four times as tough as men and twice as clever before they even deserve to do well.

Once they have shown that they deserve to do well, they will be loved and hated with greater intensity than a mere male politician.  

Thursday, 24 November 2011

Confucius: SHIT happens when you don't call things by their proper names

If names be not correct, language is not in accordance with the truth of things.

If language be not in accordance with the truth of things, affairs cannot be carried on to success.

When affairs cannot be carried on to success, proprieties and music do not flourish.

When proprieties and music do not flourish, punishments will not be properly awarded.

When punishments are not properly awarded, the people do not know how to move hand or foot.

Therefore a superior man considers it necessary that the names he uses may be spoken appropriately, and also that what he speaks may be carried out appropriately. What the superior man requires is just that in his words there may be nothing incorrect."

(Analects XIII, 3, tr. Legge)

To be a racist is the worst thing to be, but what is a racist and what constitutes racism?

Is complaining about immigration racism and bigotry?

Is BASTARDY a good thing?

Slut Single Mums are mothers of bastards. What is wrong with this definition apart from the fact that this will cause offence to sluts and bastards? Why should we consider the feelings of sluts and bastards anyway?  Are they really better than married mothers or the legitimate?

A promiscuous woman is the worst sort of woman to be (and she is also the worst sort of employee), because she breeds bastards.

Why is "bastard" a derogatory term?

Because the stupidity and the low standards of the mother will be passed on to her offspring.  Not only that, the bastard will probably have had a deprived childhood and be deprived of the benign influence of a loving male parental figure and his family connections because of the stupidity and promiscuity of his or her mother.

Excuses and allowances will be made for him if one wishes to be compassionate, lowering standards of morality and education.

It is from Sluts and Bastards that the British developed their Culture of Excuses.

If no excuses and allowances are made then we will feel bad for being harsh and illiberal.

Now, we have got to the stage where even a party that is supposed to be promoting the interests of the white race dare not criticise these sluts, because most of their membership consists of sluts and bastards.

The BNP no longer dares to criticise these promiscuous women, who commit the foul sin that is the miscegenation of the unmarried, who are making the white race weaker, more stupid, more degenerate and more cowardly with every bastard born in Britain each minute of the day.

That is why British employers would rather gouge out their eyes than hire British employees, and that is why the government continues to let immigrant labour enter the country to replace the useless bastards of the sluts.

Damned if you are nice to sluts and bastards, and also damned if you are not.

Let us call a spade a spade, a slut a slut and a bastard a bastard, instead of calling them "one-parent families".  Then we will know exactly what to do with them.

Wednesday, 23 November 2011

Feminism is failing the elderly and stripping them of their human rights

And their excuse is that they are too busy working until they are 67 to look after their elderly relations.

It is these feminists who thought it would be a good idea to give nurses degrees so they now think they are too good to wash bottoms and change bedpans and minister to the - yuck! - sick and dying.

It is the feminists who think mothers should work thus making British mothers crap and British children crap.

It is the feminists who refuse to criticise female promiscuity and who condone and encourage the existence of Slut Single Mums.

It is the feminists in the teaching profession who keep dumbing down standards to accommodate the unteachable bastards whose mothers' sluttery they dare not criticise.

Feminism is shitting and pissing on the heads of men, decent women, the elderly and the next generation of poor stupid bastards who will be fit for nothing but SLAVERY while the men of Britain dither like women, wring their hands and wonder what to do.

Speak up, you mice of Britain.  You have nothing left to lose but your CHEESE.   You will not have a pleasant old age, your childrens' futures are fucked, so you might as well tell it like you think it is.   

How do you know if you live in a MATRIARCHY?

  1. A matriarchy is a society that condones female promiscuity. 
  2. Slut Single Mums are beyond criticism.  (We know who is in power by whom we cannot criticise.)
  3. Feminism, which promotes female promiscuity, is beyond criticism.
  4. It has become advantageous for men to behave like women.
  5. Male politicians are without exception unashamed of exhibiting the female characteristics of hypocrisy, prevarication and cowardice, believing them acceptable and even necessary for their survival, even as they prate on about democracy, free speech and liberty.
  6. Use their family (by this they really mean their female partner) as an excuse for not doing the necessary thing.
  7. Men privately agree with you about the evils of Slut Single Mummery and admit they are afraid.
  8. Men who are supposed to be promoting the interests of the white race dare not criticise SSMs.  
  9. Free Love AKA Sexual Liberation has become a political orthodoxy AKA a Sacred Cow.
  10. There are more bastards being born than legitimate babies, which means that most mothers in Britain are SLUTS who will turn their bastards into useless criminal BASTARD adults.  (The hand that rocks the cradle rules the world, which means that in the West, the morals of the Slut Single Mum rule)
  11. The government is stupid and the people are mad, and vice versa.    
  12. The Unholy Trinity of Welfarism, Slut Single Mummery and Free Love reigns supreme.
What do you do if you live in a matriarchy?

Overthrow it with sweet reason.   

COWARDICE: why it is OK for women to be cowards but not men

It doesn't matter that women are cowards because they will still be useful as bearers of children (for the enemy race who will spare their lives).

Indeed, it is in the interests of the race that women do not act recklessly in case they provoke violence which may lead to death.

For men, though, it is necessary for the survival of their race that they are not cowards.  What the invader tends to do is kill the men and enslave the women and children.   So it is in their own interests that they do not behave like women.  Cowardice would suggest weakness leading to exploitation by their women or by an unscrupulous, corrupt and weak leader leading ultimately to exploitation by an external enemy.

These are the simple principles of group survival, but which will sound like rocket science even to the current and practising members of the BNP.

How SHAMEFUL that they need a female and foreigner to point this out.

How SHAMEFUL that even now they are still looking the other way and saying I am mad and pretending they don't know what I am on about.

How SHAMEFUL that even now they dare not criticise their Slut Single Mums, whom they know are ultimately stupider, weaker and more cowardly than they, who are making the white race weaker, more stupid, more degenerate and more cowardly with every bastard born in Britain each minute of the day ....

Do they even know why bastardy is considered a bad thing?  Bet they don't know and are too scared and stupid to find out, those useless, shiftless, gutless witless cunts, or already know (because they are themselves illegitimate) ...

Maybe they just don't want to be expelled from their social club (there is no point calling it a political party any more).   

What the matriarchy does to unwanted and illegitimate children whose unmarried mothers they refuse to discourage from breeding

Pump them full of drugs.  

But the men of Britain are too stupid to notice or too scared to say anything, having had their brains and balls and guts sucked out through the blow-jobs they keep getting from the sluts they love so much and dare not criticise.

Anyway, these gutless men (or shall we call them drones?) have female friends who are Slut Single Mums they are hoping to get a blow-job from, or whose mums are Slut Single Mums, whose female relations are Slut Single Mums and who probably knocked up a Slut Single Mum or two themselves.  Why, they may even have grandchildren whose mothers are Slut Single Mums.

Or they are elderly men no longer up to much.

You can insult these witless, shiftless, gutless drones all you like.  Nothing will happen because these fuckers actually feel no SHAME.

That is why it is hopeless. If only there were a collective gun to blow out the what might pass for the collective brains of this country.  Their guts are all over the floor anyway, but for some reason they won't die ....

It doesn't matter how much it costs the NHS at the expense of other patients, these women must have what they want!

If these women want a C-section then they should be made to pay for it, or get their husbands pay for it, if they have one.

Or else you will soon have Slut Single Mums demanding C-sections to breed the next generation of sluts and bastards at the expense of the British taxpayer, who is usually male.

Too bad then that the typical British male is too stupid and scared to say anything now.   Too busy at work or jerking himself off to Internet porn or screwing some slut in council accommodation who will become a Slut Single Mum demanding a C-section at the expense of other patients of the NHS, especially if they are male and elderly.

But soon, life in Britain won't be worth living anyway.   

Tuesday, 22 November 2011

Louise Mensch using her gender and her children to intimidate her detractors?

So Frank Zimmerman is going to be charged next month, and we have no idea what he said.

Bet he didn't say anything particularly scary.

Bet a man would not have gone to the police, but because she is a WOMAN ....

And this is why most women shouldn't be in politics. They just degrade the level of debate and silence their opponents by claiming they have been offended or frightened or upset by their detractors who must therefore be evil for upsetting them.

We should know now what Frank Zimmerman described as "an unemployed recluse" - said that made her shop him to the coppers.  If it turns out that it is not in fact a credible threat, or a threat that any red blooded male in British politics (well, a hypothetical one anyway) would have dismissed and not lost sleep over.

But no, we have to wait a whole bloody month before we discover what an elderly man said that might have caused this female politician to go crying to the coppers.

The questions the court should consider are:

  1. "Would a male politician of reasonable firmness have considered the communication a credible threat justifying the involvement  of the police?"
  2. "Was this female politician using her gender and her children to facilitate the punishment and intimidation of her detractor in a way that would not have been open to a male politician?"
  3. "Should this woman be charged with wasting police time if the answer question 1 is NO and the answer to question 2 is YES?"

Strangely, she is now describing herself as a "single mother".   

"As a single mother, it's a job I try not to delegate,"  

she tweeted.

Has she already divorced the second husband she married in June?  She seems to be going through husbands at the rate of knots.

Louise Bagshawe used to be my Facebook friend.   

Monday, 21 November 2011

Nominate Claire Khaw for the iPM New Year's Honours

Do you think I have done something extraordinary or just deserve attention over and above what I have already so skilfully managed to generate on own?

Saturday, 19 November 2011

A white woman's instinctive response after watching this video of an old man floored by a thug

She said:

"It seems a perfect example to me of 'black on black crime'. They are obviously drunk or on drugs. At least they didn't attack the women."

Why? The women are more likely to be slut single mums. The old man, even if his mother was as slut, was not responsible for his bastardy.

Did this woman think the mothers of the young man and his gang members who punched the old man for no reason were married when they were born?

Are there any white liberal women who want to cuddle these young black men who have had bad slutty mothers and slap them on the wrist after a compassionate heart to heart about the errors of their ways?

If these women get gang-raped by these young black men, should we feel sorry for them?

Maybe it would be less distressing to witness if these young black men only practised hunting liberals ie those who are soft on crime, sluts and bastards and the causes of crime, sluts and bastards.

Those who are soft on crime, sluts and bastards and the causes of crime, sluts and bastards tend tend to be white middle class liberal feminists ie women, who may be slut single mums themselves, or have daughters who are slut single mums, or who have female friends who are slut single mums.  

Clearly, it was the reproductive choices of WOMEN and their bad mothering who created these young black thugs.

Should we even blame these young black thugs for behaving the way they do when most of their peers behave like that anyway?

Perhaps the white race are indeed to blame because it is white people's liberal feminist governments who refuse to get tough on this sort of behaviour nor the slut single mums and their bad mothering who produce the kind of young black men witnessed on the happy slapping video you just saw.  

If you ask anyone in the liberal political establishment (and this includes the liberal media) if criminality is related to Slut Single Mums they will pretend they do not know what you are talking about and perhaps suggest you are mad and silly, when really they are probably thinking of the following:

  1. female relations who are slut single mums
  2. their female friends who are slut single mums
  3. the mother of their illegitimate child (if they are male eg Ed Miliband and Justine Thornton now Mrs Miliband)
  4. their mother or 
  5. even themselves (if they are female) 
who fall under the category of being a Slut Single Mum ie a mother of a BASTARD.

Is it true then that WOMEN are to blame for most of the ills of this world?

Obviously, if they are not in charge, you cannot blame them, but they are in charge, and the attitude of this particular white middle class woman was quite clear - it was a mixture of racism and indifference to the victim because not only was he black, he was also a mere man.
And this is the reason why feminism must be challenged.  The liberal media all know about me and who I am, and their policy is to IGNORE me, hoping that I will get tired and eventually go away.  
Don't look to the BNP to challenge feminism because they are all stuffed with sluts and bastards too.  They are also trying to court the female vote (have you seen their new love heart BNP logo?) so they won't be saying anything about
  2. the principles of racial health and hygiene ie their promiscuous women who make bad reproductive choices and who often have illegitimate and disabled offspring who grow up to become either welfare-dependant NEETs or criminals (whom British employers do not want as employees)
  3. the female-dominated teaching profession that refuses to condemn slut single mummery
  4. why white men would rather let their women remain sluts because otherwise they wouldn't be getting any "action" because no woman would want to marry a man with a lifetime of welfare dependency in front of and behind him or a McJob (unless she were a stupid slut gagging to pass on her genes )
In fact, the BNP even expelled me for saying that it is not a good idea for the white race for white women to copy the behaviour of Riven Vincent (who knew 13 years ago that she had Multiple Sclerosis and then went on to have her severely disabled daughter Celyn, who is blind, cannot lift her head nor move any of her limbs who cannot be criticised).  

We know who are in charge by whom we cannot criticise, and we cannot criticise SLUT SINGLE MUMS or women who make bad reproductive choices and whose existence and their offspring are a burden on others who are not their husband.  

Would you rather be afraid of an Evil Dictator or the Secret Police, or would you rather be known as being a citizen of a nation whose government and its dishonourable opposition are all afraid of Slut Single Mums, whose numbers are greater than the mothers of legitimate children?

Would you rather your nation be known as a nation of sluts and bastards?

If you are an effeminate man feminised by years of feminism you will probably have no principles and feel no shame, and have no idea what I am on about.  In any case, you will be too busy jerking yourself off to Internet porn to be reading this.

And even if you did read this and understood what I am saying, you won't be doing anything about it, because the next thing you will do is find some Internet porn to jerk yourself off to, to take your mind off things, and then you will go to the pub to find some slut to fuck and give you a blow-job, which, fortunately for you, ain't too hard, because there are lots of stupid sluts around gagging to be the mother of your illegitimate children, which you won't have to pay for, because the taxpayer is made to pick up the tab .... 

Friday, 18 November 2011

The moral case for legalising brothel-keeping

  1. It would be a job creation scheme for slut single mums who will need a source of income after the welfare state is dismantled.  
  2. It would stop men from thinking there is such a thing as no-strings sex. 
  3. It would allow us to digest the idea that it is possible to be lower than a whore if you are a slut single mum.  By this I mean a prostitute tells the punter the price in advance, while a slut pretends its free and then contacts the CSA when the illegitimate baby is born, and then the man will find himself paying for the child he never intended to have with a woman he would never dream of marrying.  
  4. It would discourage sluts from exploiting vulnerable men who cannot say NO to a woman who offers them what they think is no-strings sex.
  5. It would attract tourists and help our balance of payments.
  6. It would discourage more sluts and bastards from coming into being.
  7. The Koran in fact tolerates prostitution and therefore brothel-keeping.
  8. It would demolish the whole rotten edifice of FEMINISM in one satisfying explosion.

Feminism BAD for women. 1 in 4 women in the US a CRAZY LADY!

Is it because most of these women are sluts or bastards (because their mothers are sluts)?

I bet there is a direct correlation to mental illness with sluttery and bastardy that is endemic in the West.   It is so endemic that most people now think it is NORMAL to either be a slut or a bastard, and you can get expelled from a white nationalist party just for pointing out that sluttery and bastardy is not good for the white race.

But, hey, you can only try, eh?

White is the New Black.

" ... the social conditions faced by black Americans--poverty, racism, unemployment, female-headed households, illegitimacy, and the increasing divorce rate [fuelled by FEMINISM]--place blacks at high risk for 'mental disorder, crime and family and community breakdown.'

It is not a matter of being black or white, it is a matter of what you do.

Are you a stupid slut?

Or maybe you've just been a stupid fucker all your life?

Time to stop and think, and put it away for a bit, eh?

Tuesday, 15 November 2011

If I ran the BNP David Starkey would already be a member. Ditto Jeremy Clarkson

The miscegenation of the unmarried should be a hot topic amongst nationalists, but I see no sign of this.

We all know why black people are mostly criminal. It is because black people are mostly illegitimate. Now that white people are mostly illegitimate, they have become like black people, as David Starkey says.

Rude though he is, he is not rude enough to criticise Slut Single Mums which really would be lese majeste.

We know who is in power by those we cannot criticise - the matriarchy who protects and encourages the Slut Single Mum, the woman who makes poor reproductive choices eg Riven Vincent and the Bad Mother eg Fiona McKeown who brought the disgraceful quality of British motherhood to international notice.  (Why do the footmen of the matriarchy - men of the Left like Paul Lewis of The Guardian - refuse to see this and admit this?  Probably because they have taken on the feminine characteristics of denial, prevarication, hypocrisy and cowardice because it profits them to behave more like women than like men.

Yet, even then, the degenerate British felt no shame about Fiona McKeown who had cast British motherhood in such a bad light, and only cast around to see whom they could blame for the easily preventable misfortune that befell her late sexually active under-aged daughter.

The hand that rocks the cradle rules the world and the hand that rocks the cradle of the illegitimate British baby is a SLUT SINGLE MUM.  It is she who is responsible for the DEGENERACY of the White Race and, very soon the fall of Western civilisation.

Sadly, degenerate white men no longer have the courage to criticise their women and will expel anyone from their nationalist party anyone who criticises their Slut Single Mums (whom they have now in effect deified), especially if they have Disabled and Illegitimate Offspring.

Tragically for them, they have made a god of their appetites and now worship it slavishly.


YUSUFALI: Nay, the wrong-doers (merely) follow their own lusts, being devoid of knowledge. But who will guide those whom Allah leaves astray? To them there will be no helpers. 

PICKTHAL: Nay, but those who do wrong follow their own lusts without knowledge. Who is able to guide him whom Allah hath sent astray? For such there are no helpers. 

SHAKIR: Nay! those who are unjust follow their low desires without any knowledge; so who can guide him whom Allah makes err? And they shall have no helpers.

Thursday, 10 November 2011

Orwell Prize: Writing the Riots. My encounter with Paul Lewis, Yasmin Alhibai Brown and Mary Riddell

Paul Lewis - a good-looking young man as you can see

Paul Lewis being interviewed by Daisy Newman with her ma's hand holding recorder

Paul Lewis explaining why Daisy Newman's question was so stupid it did not deserve an answer

Paul Lewis - looking impossibly dashing so it is not surprising that he is full of himself

Paul Lewis with the latest copy of Private Eye

While I hoped (but did not expect) that David Starkey would  be on the WRITING THE RIOTS panel,  I was disappointed that no reference at all was made about his comment that whites have become black, despite much talk about the racial disadvantage being suffered by blacks, especially by Nicolas Kent.

Aware that Paul Lewis is doing research into the causes of the riots, I wondered what he thought about the possibility of illegitimacy being the common factor.   To this the arrogant young pup responded haughtily that the remark was so stupid it did not deserve an answer.   (I might have taken it personally had I not heard him say exactly the same thing to a pretty young lady who was playing at being journalist with her mother, when she asked him a very good question: Should social media be closed down during riots if it is that which is facilitating in their rioting?  To this the arrogant young pup said that the British cannot be like the, yuck, Arabs or any of those non-Western peoples who do sensible things to keep the forces of chaos at bay, or words to that effect.)

I asked Paul Lewis why it was stupid to suggest that illegitimacy was a factor as there was much evidence to suggest that illegitimacy was a factor, particularly as I remember politicians talking about telling parent(s) on the radio, during the riots, to give their children a call to see where they were, as well as blaming the riots on "bad parenting" and "absent fathers".  Still the Arrogant Young Pup maintained that there was no evidence to suggest that this was so.

I asked if there were any statistics being compiled to link illegitimacy with rioting, and he said there was no evidence to suggest that.

I asked if there were any statistics being compiled to discover if there is such a link and was not given a proper answer.

I asked if not, why not, but did not receive a proper answer either, and was dismissed from his presence when he told me that we would have to agree to disagree.

I then approached Yasmin Alibhai Brown

I started by asking what she thought of the fact that it seemed that Muslims with shops appeared to be the race that suffered most from the riots.

Oh, it was because they are the ones with the shops to loot, she answered.

Why, I asked, was it that brown people were the ones with the shops while white and black people were the looters of those  shops?  Was she not concerned for her fellow-Muslims?

A white man died in Ealing, she said, and there were Asian rioters too.  Nevertheless, there were fewer Asian rioters and more Asian men died as a result of the riots, but she would not accept this point, for some reason.  (I had thought she would be concerned about her fellow Muslims having shops being looted and their sons killed in defence of their shops, but I could see no hint of this.)

I then mentioned David Starkey whom I thought seemed to have put his finger on it: black people are known to be mostly illegitimate and white people are these days mostly illegitimate too.   There was the connection, surely, even if David Starkey did not himself specifically mention illegitimacy?

"David Starkey knows nothing!" she said, angrily.

"David Starkey knows nothing about anything except Tudors," she added, before walking off and ending the conversation.

I had better luck with Mary Riddell though, whom I felt just had a hint of integrity and journalistic standards despite my suspecting her to be a bit of a Lefty, and I warmed to her and liked her in spite of my suspicions.   I think it was actually she whom the late Susan Crosland (whose funeral is blogged at said she did not wish to be interviewed by because she was feeling fragile after the death of Auberon Waugh and opted for an interviewer whom she felt would be gentler and perhaps less penetratingly sharp.   (If I have got this wrong and am confusing her with another female journalist who asked to interview Susan but did not get to, no doubt Mary will correct me.)

At any rate, Mary admitted that she had forgotten about David Starkey's remarks and agreed that they should have been discussed.  She too rushed off though - perhaps made uneasy by the subject - or really because she did have a dinner date.   She was nicely dressed for it anyway, and I hope she enjoyed her evening.  

I trust she will, if her time and her journalistic integrity permits, consider the correlation between illegitimacy feminism and the chaos that will end Western civilisation if Western governments in conspiracy with Liberal Feminist journalists of the Left continue to ignore, deny and suppress the evidence that tolerance of slut single mums that breed their variously fathered feral bastards at taxpayers' expense will destroy their nation.

demonstrates the 50% connection between parasitical bastard-breeding sluts and half our GDP going to them and their spawn.

70% of convicted prisoners were singly-parented, and, black people, being mostly singly-parented mostly make up this group in the US.

White people have become like black people.

Our politicians are afraid of offending Slut Single Mums because too many of them now have the vote.   

Do liberals really want to be governed by a government afraid of Slut Single Mums?

Do liberal journalists really hate their own children so much they don't care if they grow up in Paedo Bastard Britain Slutland and become unemployable welfare-dependent Paedos, Bastards and Sluts, and are known as such by other nations?

Oh, and don't anyone dare call me racist when writing about me or I will sue.   You can call me "Slut Single Mum-ist" or Sluttophobe, if you like, but I don't think there is a law against this ... yet ....

Wednesday, 9 November 2011

How to discourage female promiscuity by regulating the supply of the pill

A slut is a woman with the sexual morality of a man.  

This lifestyle became possible with the invention of the contraceptive pill, but women still have unwanted pregnancies and illegitimate children all over the place.  This shows that women are not really that clever even with something apparently as fool-proof as the pill.  

The pill entices them into extramarital sex with the promise of protection yet, through negligence, recklessness and incompetence, they continue getting knocked up, suffer from unwanted pregnancy something chronic and have their variously-fathered feral bastards all over the place the behaviour of whom bring the white race into disrepute.  

I therefore propose withdrawing the pill from any woman who does not declare herself to be a prostitute.  While regular tax assessments will be sent to her by HMRC, no further action will be taken even if she declares her earnings to be nil.   

If she is really a working prostitute then of course she would be obliged to declare her earnings.

If she is merely a fornicatress she would enjoy the benefit of being regularly reminded that her fornication has not earned her anything.    

Wednesday, 2 November 2011

Cougars and Cubs

Men (or should I say "Cubs"), if you are young and charming and patient enough, with coachman-like good looks and don't mind being treated as a servant, you can always shack up with a cougar AKA sugarmummy who will have fertility issues or who doesn't want children. After all, if you are low enough to do this, you don't deserve to breed or don't want to anyway.

This is about young men who are low enough to sleep with older women for their money, but who give up the chance of being a father of legitimate children and having a normal family life. These men are no better than male prostitutes, because we all know men really prefer to shag younger women but can shag older women if they are given the right financial incentive.

If all younger men became cubs, then the human race would die out, but I guess this would suit younger men with no self-respect who want to sleep their way into money rather than earn it themselves, who use environmental concerns to avoid having the responsibilities of taking a wife and being a father of legitimate children.

The cub will of course have the option of divorcing the cougar and moving on to a younger cougar. He may even get half her stuff and her house.

I have been told by aspiring "cubs" that older women are more interesting and sexually experienced. Perhaps this is only to be expected when women are protected by employment legislation that allows them to compete unfairly with men. 

It is not about whether these cougars are still shaggable, but the morality and long term societal consequences of enticing younger men to shag women who are past child-bearing, when they could be working and maintaining families of their own with legitimate offspring.

This is of course the quickest way of creating a nation of drones.

Perhaps affluenza means a declining birth rate and is as inevitable as night following day, old age, arthritis, illness and death. 

Perhaps there is nothing you can do with civilisations who are at this particular part of their cycle. 

So, perhaps it will be the end of Western civilisation as we know it, when it will become Muslim civilisation in the West, because at least Islam tells Muslims to have legitimate children and to  respect the institutions of marriage and family, to think about posterity and future generations, while cubs are thinking of which cougars to shack up with, in a childless but financially advantageous relationship.

Two interesting facts:  When you hit 60 you are called a jaguar.  Also, Khadija, the Prophet Muhammad's first wife, was a cougar and he a cub. The marriage was not however childless and she had four daughters by him.

Friday, 14 October 2011

A Culture of Contempt for the Elderly created by Feminism

Following yesterday's coverage of the Care Quality Commission's report on NHS elderly care, a number of listeners contacted the programme to tell their own story. Adam Rodin, whose 93-year-old father died in hospital last week, describes the bad experience he had.

Following on from the Care Quality Commission's damning report on NHS elderly care, many listeners contacted the Today programme to share their own experiences. Dame Joan Bakewell, former government champion for the elderly, and Dr Raymond Tallis, philosopher and former professor of geriatric medicine, analyse the issues behind the story.

It is very interesting that Adam Rodin, who is himself a hospital consultant, refused to name the hospital that his father was so badly treated in.   He said, very disturbingly, that this could happen in any hospital.  It is the culture, he said.

A matriarchy: a society that condones and rewards female promiscuity, despises the elderly, is sentimental about children, obsessed by celebrity culture and the shallow values of youth and beauty.

A patriarchy: a society that condones male promiscuity, and looks after the old because it values wisdom.

Feminists: you too will be old and at the mercy of the uncaring carers you have trained under feminist ideology.

Men who try to discipline the bastard feral offspring of sluts are accused of being paedophiles, are they not?

Women who are not longer sexually attractive are useless ugly old hags, aren't they, in our Brave New World?

Joan Bakewell said  nurses should role play and put themselves in the role of the elderly! More demented matriarchal SHITE.

Nurses ignore the elderly and the incontinent because they are disgusting and remind them of despair, desperation and death.  Most would rather look after the young than the old because youth is full of hope, and the elderly only remind us we are all going to ail and die.

Remember that scene in THE BEACH when one of the beach community was bitten by a shark?  He kept moaning and groaning and wouldn't get better.  His presence was spoiling their fun and eventually he was moved out of sight and out of hearing to die, without disturbing the life of the community.  The leader of that community was female (Tilda Swinton) who blackmailed Leonardo de Caprio into having sex with her.

SOYLENT GREEN was rather kinder to the ailing and elderly, was it not?

Kindness and generosity in short supply said Joan Bakewell. We used to learn all those things in church, she said. Where do we learn these things from now, she asked. Certainly not in the home who are run by working mothers or parasitical sluts with no morals and no education. We no longer do kindness, generosity, respect for the elderly and consideration for others because decades of liberal feminist atheist SHITE has bred it out of us.

The feminists of today will be the elderly doubly incontinent bedblockers of tomorrow. Even having children won't help you now, because they will just send you to a hospital or to an uncaring care home. Your daughters will be too busy working till they are 67 to look after you. Your sons will be impoverished losers after their wives have divorced them and kicked them out of their matrimonial homes, if they get married at all. You will have grandchildren, some of them even legitimate, but if you have a son, you will not see any of your grandchildren by him because his spiteful ex-wife will see to it that you and your son don't.

And so Britain continues its descent into cultural and moral degradation stuffing its stupid fat disgusting face with foul liberal atheist feminist SHITE like there's no tomorrow, which there isn't, let's face it, you stupid liberal feminist LOSERS.

A society that does not value WISDOM because those who have it are no longer strong and attractive will revert to BARBARISM very very very soon indeed.

FEMINISM hurts everyone: the young, the male and the elderly and brings women into utter contempt because it encourages them to behave worse than a prostitute and a promiscuous homosexual.

At least prostitutes give you an up-front price for sex (so you are not chased by the CSA to maintain a child you never wanted to have by a cheap slut you would never dream of marrying) and at least promiscuous homosexuals don't have BASTARDS to spread crime and disorder and paedophilia in your society.

What is the BNP doing, that party who is supposed to care about such things like the moral and cultural degradation of the white race? SWEET. FUCK. ALL.

It too is queuing up to lick the stilettos of the feminists and slut single mums.

Question and challenge feminism? Why, that would be OFFENSIVE. Oo er!

Sunday, 9 October 2011

The girly and incoherent concept of HUMAN RIGHTS

‎"Human Rights", eh? Is there any other kind of right on this earth??  Animal rights?  Vegetable rights?  Mineral rights?

I would have thought that the most FUNDAMENTAL human right would be to have freedom of expression.

But liberals no longer believe in this FUNDAMENTAL LIBERAL PRINCIPLE.

What are fundamental liberal principles?

Bet you don't know, because you are all fucking stupid. So here they are then:

1. The right to property

2. Freedom of expression

3. Freedom of association

4. Freedom of contract

5. Freedom of belief

Because you are all stupid, I bet you haven't noticed that:

Holocaust Denial is THOUGHTCRIME.

Incitement to racial hatred is THOUGHTCRIME.

Incitement to religious hatred is THOUGHTCRIME.

Not hiring someone because you think she is the wrong sex is THOUGHTCRIME.

Not hiring someone because you don't like homosexuals is THOUGHTCRIME.

Not hiring someone disabled because you would rather not is THOUGHTCRIME.

Not hiring someone because you think he or she is too young or too old for the job is THOUGHTCRIME.

Not hiring someone because you don't like his or her religion is THOUGHTCRIME.

Hating is THOUGHTCRIME, folks. These fucking liberals are presuming to tell us whom we can and cannot HATE.

And you stupid fuckers put up with this sort of shit like the stupid fucking sheeple you are.

And these liberals who started the crap at the European Convention of Human Rights insist on the rightness and necessity of their thoughtcrimes while fining your government for not giving prisoners the right to vote.

And nobody notices how fucking stupid this is.

By the way, did you know that the Koran states that "There is no compulsion in belief"?

Bet you ignorant idiots didn't know that the Koran is more liberal than liberalism.


The reason why it doesn't seem that way is because most Muslims are too lazy and stupid to read the Koran, and too scared to question and discuss it with their fellow Muslims.

But are Muslims more stupid and lazy than Americans who don't know and don't care that their constitution has been flouted by successive governments?

The answer is NO.  Muslims are not more lazy and stupid than Americans who don't know and don't care that the US constitution is being flouted by successive US governments.   In fact, the US constitution is a damn sight shorter than the Koran.

I think being pussywhipped by Slut Single Mums makes you stupid, scared, skint, weak and despised, and white men are undeniably pussywhipped by Slut Single Mums.  The anti-immigrant political parties are actually the most pussywhipped because they are so pathetically grateful that any woman should turn up to their meetings that they want to court the female vote, forgetting that courting the female vote was what brought the nation and civilisation to its current degraded and dumbed-down state.

This is what happens when men abdicate power to the weaker sex.

Guardian writer, Tehmina Kazi, a "Muslim", disliked my comments so much she blocked me on Facebook

Tehmina Kazi, Director of BMSD

I have met this lady and our exchanges previously had been friendly. However, because she is a woman she has conformed to type and is simply doing what most women do, which is to silence and demonise those who disagree with them in their totalitarian way.

Tehmina praised the fact that Ottoman Emperior decriminalised homosexuality.

To this I said:

Tehmina would support the legalisation of homosexuality and ignoring the Koranic injunction against homosexuality.

What makes her [as a Muslim] think that liberalism is a superior to Koranic principles? What right has she to unilaterally decide that homosexuality should be legalised when it says plainly in the Koran that it is forbidden?

YUSUFALI: If any of your women are guilty of lewdness, Take the evidence of four (Reliable) witnesses from amongst you against them; and if they testify, confine them to houses until death do claim them, or Allah ordain for them some (other) way.
PICKTHAL: As for those of your women who are guilty of lewdness, call to witness four of you against them. And if they testify (to the truth of the allegation) then confine them to the houses until death take them or (until) Allah appoint for them a way (through new legislation).
SHAKIR: And as for those who are guilty of an indecency from among your women, call to witnesses against them four (witnesses) from among you; then if they bear witness confine them to the houses until death takes them away or Allah opens some way for them.
YUSUFALI: If two men among you are guilty of lewdness, punish them both. If they repent and amend, Leave them alone; for Allah is Oft-returning, Most Merciful.
PICKTHAL: And as for the two of you who are guilty thereof, punish them both. And if they repent and improve, then let them be. Lo! Allah is ever relenting, Merciful.
SHAKIR: And as for the two who are guilty of indecency from among you, give them both a punishment; then if they repent and amend, turn aside from them; surely Allah is Oft-returning (to mercy), the Merciful.

So Tehmina is just going to IGNORE it then, is she, because she has decided that Koranic principles should SUBMIT to liberal laws of gay couples being allowed to marry each other?
Is she no longer a Muslim then?

Secularism means just valuing godless ideologies above established religion. It means that secular governments have the power to pass legislation that offends against religious principles. Tehmina clearly thinks that liberalism should prevail over Islam, and is happy to do so.
But it is annoying that Muslims like Tehmani think the Koran is like the Woolworth's Pick and Mix section.

It is only criminal when there are 4 witnesses ....

To this Tehmina said:

Thanks folks! I wondered why Claire Khaw was trolling on my wall - I had defriended her a few months ago and thought my wall was only open to Friends? Must be the new Facebook settings

before blocking me.   

For lesbians, you need to have 4 witnesses to your lesbian act before you can be convicted. Unless you are an incorrigible exhibitionist, I think you would be safe from persecution. 

Even if you were successfully prosecuted someone would have to stand guard outside your house to confine you until you are dead, and they will probably find they have other fish to fry after they have calmed down a bit. 

So I think most lesbians would be left well alone.

YUSUFALI: O ye who believe! Avoid suspicion as much (as possible): for suspicion in some cases is a sin: And spy not on each other behind their backs. Would any of you like to eat the flesh of his dead brother? Nay, ye would abhor it...But fear Allah: For Allah is Oft-Returning, Most Merciful.
PICKTHAL: O ye who believe! Shun much suspicion; for lo! some suspicion is a crime. And spy not, neither backbite one another. Would one of you love to eat the flesh of his dead brother? Ye abhor that (so abhor the other)! And keep your duty (to Allah). Lo! Allah is Relenting, Merciful.
SHAKIR: O you who believe! avoid most of suspicion, for surely suspicion in some cases is a sin, and do not spy nor let some of you backbite others. Does one of you like to eat the flesh of his dead brother? But you abhor it; and be careful of (your duty to) Allah, surely Allah is Oft-returning (to mercy), Merciful.

Do not spy on homosexuals to obtain evidence of their homosexuality. So only those who are incorrigible cottagers get done. 

I don't have a problem with any of this. 

The point is that the Koran would never make even a long term homosexual relationship equal to marriage, and that is fair enough for me.  

The tax advantage to having a civil partnership is to inherit free of 40% inheritance tax.  My concession to homosexuals in a long term relationship would be this: abolish inheritance tax altogether.  I think this would be very popular even amongst heterosexuals with offspring.

Why can't Tehmina debate this in a sensible fashion?  The reason is not because she is a Muslim but because she is a woman and a liberal who writes for The Guardian.

Thursday, 6 October 2011

The Development and Death of Human Civilisations

Peace and Prosperity feminises a people, making them profligate, reckless, frivolous, hedonistic and foolish.  This disposes them to try new silly and mad ideas such as feminism and the welfare state, and paying Slut Single Mums to have bastards at the expense of the taxpayer, making the national gene pool deteriorate and causing a vicious race to the bottom of ever-lowering educational, intellectual and moral standards.

When men are emasculated and behave like women, and women acquire the rights of men but still behave like women, you have a matriarchy.

A patriarchy is a society that condones male promiscuity.

A matriarchy is a society that condones  and rewards female promiscuity.

When confronted with two evils, we should always choose the lesser one.

The policies of the matriarchy makes the working classes unfit for purpose necessitating the import of cheap foreign labour, upsetting the balance of that society.

When that society is upset, distressed and unbalanced enough, a situation of war or revolution will prevail.

War and revolution will of course allow the patriarchy to seize back the power it abdicated to the weaker sex when it succumbed to the charms of feminism, cheap sex and easy women.

And so the Tytler Cycle starts again.

A democracy is always temporary in nature; it simply cannot exist as a permanent form of government. A democracy will continue to exist up until the time that voters discover that they can vote themselves generous gifts from the public treasury. From that moment on, the majority always votes for the candidates who promise the most benefits from the public treasury, with the result that every democracy will finally collapse due to loose fiscal policy, which is always followed by a dictatorship.

The average age of the world's greatest civilizations from the beginning of history has been about 200 years. During those 200 years, these nations always progressed through the following sequence:

  • From bondage to spiritual faith;
  • From spiritual faith to great courage;
  • From courage to liberty;
  • From liberty to abundance;
  • From abundance to selfishness;
  • From selfishness to complacency;
  • From complacency to apathy;
  • From apathy to dependence;
  • From dependence back into bondage. concerns nations cursed by God, which would include all nations affected and infected by feminism.   The West is clearly more accursed and more infested by feminists.  The Credit Crunch, the banking crisis and the sovereign debt crises has its origins in feminism - promoted by liberalism - which is fed by the practice of all the seven deadly sins, as well as your current inability to list all of them without looking them up.

Yes, you, too are one of the accursed, if you cannot remember what they are, without looking it up.


Wednesday, 5 October 2011

Why BASTARD is a term of abuse

Because this is what happens to your politics and your nation and your race if you are stupid enough to tolerate widespread bastardy after embracing the toxic ideology of feminism, for, in time you will become a matriarchy.

What is a patriarchy?

A society that condones male promiscuity.

What is a matriarchy?

A society that not only condones female promiscuity, but positively rewards it.

By this, I mean you will have a government that actually pays Slut Single Mums to have their Bastards at taxpayers' expense and whose government and its opposition are too afraid to criticise these women, because it wants their votes, even as their parasitical existence eats the nation out of house and home.

Not only are men in a matriarchy afraid to criticise the Slut Single Mum - the worst sort of woman and the worst sort of employee, they are also afraid to marry, because wives can divorce men for no good reason and get half their property.

Why is the Slut Single Mum the worst sort of woman?  She is a promiscuous woman who has illegitimate offspring will go on to become the criminals and under-achievers of the future, and the future is already here.  She will also  infect those around her with apathy, hypocrisy and cowardice and a tolerance of widespread illegitimacy which utterly emasculates the men, who will start thinking and behaving like women.

When this happens, the country will fill up with immigrants who will do better than the natives, just because they are not mostly illegitimate.

Sadly, very sadly, the men of the BNP - a political party that is supposed to care about the racial health of white people - are undeniably infected by tolerance of widespread illegitimacy.  The leader of this party is so  afraid of offending these women that he would expel a member for saying anything that might offend women, and women are so easily offended, especially these days, are they not?

Not only that, the man who opposes the leader of the BNP - Eddy Butler, a former high-ranking official of of the BNP, is also afraid of offending these never married mothers.  

There is really no one in the country that will stand up against these sirens who are leading the ship of state into the rocks.  Even the Muslims, who are exhorted by the Koran to forbid what is evil and to enjoin what is good, are also afraid of Slut Single Mums.

If you are told you live in a matriarchy, it is like being told that you society has cancer, which is probably  terminal.

Astonishingly and disgracefully, the white race now finds itself in the position of having a non-white foreign woman reminding them of the importance of supporting the institutions of Marriage and Family, while they behave like primitive tribesman to whom the concept of marriage is novel, radical and rather unpleasant.

Is there the possibility of remission from such an advanced stage of civilisational dementia?  Only if there is a revolution.

Tuesday, 4 October 2011

Progressive Degeneration (pun intended) and the Miscegenation of the Unmarried

This is how sexual reproduction amongst mammals works.

The male of the species is always always up for it.

The female of the species is not, because she needs to be careful to choose the strongest male with  access to the best resources to provide and protect for her and the offspring she has with him.  

The most efficient way of doing this is for the male to have a harem.   This is probably where the "Women and Children First" rule came into being.  If, say, the passengers of a sinking passenger ship were the only people left in the world, then it would make sense if only reproductively vigorous and high-ranking males were allowed to join the women and children in the only lifeboat, leaving the males that are too old, too physically weak or weak in character to assert themselves, to go down with the sinking ship.   

In no time at all would the race replenish itself under such a system were these passengers to find a suitably hospitable tropical island.   

Lions also have a simple system.  The lion king has his harem with exclusive breeding rights.  These rights will be covered by would-be usurpers who would challenge the incumbent for access to his harem from time to time.  The lionesses make no attempt to assist their lord and master even as they know that his death or defeat would mean their cubs would be killed by the usurping lion, who will then impregnate each and every member of the harem.   

The lionesses never run away because if they did they would die without offspring.

Having your cubs killed may be upsetting and disconcerting but they will soon have new cubs, with better genes than the defeated lion, their former lord and master.   

Female whales too have a tried and trusted system of choosing mates.  If looking for a mate she would simply attract the attention of a number of male whales gathered together, and then swim off as fast as she can.  The fittest male who can capture her gets to mate with her.   

But what is the mating behaviour of the Slut Single Mum?

Such a woman does not realise that she is supposed to be married before she has babies, so she is stupid and ignorant.

It is very easy for a woman to have sex with men because most men are incapable of saying no to no-strings sex and think it would be rude to refuse.   

It is not so easy to get a man to marry you.

If you have a baby without getting married, you will be impoverishing both yourself and your child socially, economically, culturally and intellectually, because it will not have the benefit of half the cultural, economic, social  and intellectual input of its other parent.

That illegitimate child will grow into an adult who thinks that there is nothing wrong in illegitimacy and will in turn have illegitimate offspring who will then go on to have illegitimate offspring etc, starting a chain of bastardy that will degrade and impoverish the entire race.  

Of course the more illegitimacy is tolerated the more of it there will be.

The more of it there is, the harder it will become to criticise the illegitimate and their sluttish mother, until more than half the babies born in Britain are illegitimate, which is now already the case.

What is wrong with illegitimacy?  It just means your society will suffer from ever lowering moral and educational standards.  For example, British employers do not want to hire British workers and actually prefer foreign labour because they are not mostly illegitimate, are motivated and trained,  and therefore get the job done more cheaply and better.

It just means that the white working classes will be neglected and marginalised because they are not fit for purpose.  You would have thought someone would care enough about them to discourage them from having illegitimate children who are a burden on the sate, but not a bit of it.  Liberals want to be everyone's friend and friends do not give each other unwanted advice or be a party pooper.   Indeed, liberal parents make their children call them by their first names so they can be their "friend" because it makes them feel old to be called "mum" or "dad".  Just like liberal parents, successive liberal governments have abdicated their responsibilities to the detriment of the people who would have appreciated the moral guidance.  

The Conservative Party in 2002 had Theresa May saying they are no longer the nasty party and would no longer criticise never married mothers AKA Slut Single Mums

The Conservative Party turned liberal and abandoned all its principles in a bid for popularity under Cameron, because it did not want to be seen as a party of party poopers.   That is why the Tories are now stuffed with fornicators, adulterers and homosexuals saying it is OK to be Slut Single Mums.  

Even the recent riots did not shock them into saying anything about Slut Single Mums, as politicians begged "parents" to at least call up their children to find out where they were at the height of the riots of the summer of 2011.  Even then the criticisms were directed at "absent fathers" and this abstraction called "bad parenting" when really they meant the Slut Single Mum and their feral bastards.   

So now we have this alarming situation of the all political parties in the UK being afraid to criticise the Slut Single Mum because there are now too many of them with the vote.   

But if we do not criticise them, they will carry on breeding their bastards at taxpayers' expense, to their heart's content and their bastards will behave in a way that will bring disgrace and ignominy on all the white race, but no, even the BNP, who are supposed to care about the future and the quality of the British national gene pool, refuse to speak against the tolerance of widespread illegitimacy.   This is probably because so many of their members are illegitimate and singly parenting, probably more so than any other party in the UK, for the BNP are really genuinely the party of the white working class, while the Labour Party is full of the chattering classes, champagne socialists and people who like to think of themselves as the intelligentsia. 

So there we have it, the typical Slut Single Mum who is breeding her bastards at the expense of the British taxpayer, does not even have the sense to behave like a rational lioness or a rational female whale, but instead thinks it very clever to have stranger sex with men in toilets and use men as inadvertent sperm donors.   The men are of course very silly and weak to allow themselves to be used in this way by their treacherous women who use their sperm to acquire a status.  The more welfare you claim, the higher up you become in the pecking order of welfare scroungers, and of course having as many children as you can on child benefit is an excellent way of acquiring status amongst the feral underclasses.

How deeply disappointing then that the BNP refuses to speak out against these women.  So many times have I heard that the BNP are a party of family values who cares deeply about the welfare and future of the white race, who are now sadly and slowly turning into white trash, for such behaviour is now seeping upwards to the middle classes who are contaminated by feminism, whose women either do not have children because they are too busy working or have too few of them because they have to climb the career ladder first before breeding and then going back to work again.  Working middle classes mothers also disadvantage their children socially and morally but women these days are now beyond criticism.  

The BNP are certainly not going to challenge feminism, for they are very anxious to attract women into their ranks, because having women in their party suggests that the men are civilised and desirable.  

And so the BNP continue to the practice of Omerta to the detriment of the very people whose interests they claim to be serving.  

Indeed, even Eddy Butler, formerly of the BNP, and who now loathes the incumbent leader, cannot bring himself to break this vow of silence, for he too is afraid of the Slut Single Mum.   

How ironic then that it is that someone who is NOT of the white race should find herself have to tell white people about the basics of keeping your race healthy and well by promoting the institutions of marriage and family.  Indeed, it is worrying that only a foreigner and a female will say these things in Britain now.

If the British do not attempt to reconsecrete the desecrated institutions of Marriage and Family, then, soon, nobody will want to have anything to do with them, or give them jobs or marry them or even have sex with them for free.   

It is however disconcerting to be confronted by blank incomprehension, howls of rage, threats of violence and murder and then by suspension and expulsion from a party that I had fondly imagined would be promoting family values supported by marriage.   

At least I care enough about the white race to brave their wrath by pointing out the error of their ways, unlike their own people who do not care enough even to tell them they should find someone to marry before having babies, and patiently explain, again and again and again, why things would be better for them if they were to do so.