The girly and incoherent concept of HUMAN RIGHTS

‎"Human Rights", eh? Is there any other kind of right on this earth??  Animal rights?  Vegetable rights?  Mineral rights?

I would have thought that the most FUNDAMENTAL human right would be to have freedom of expression.

But liberals no longer believe in this FUNDAMENTAL LIBERAL PRINCIPLE.

What are fundamental liberal principles?

Bet you don't know, because you are all fucking stupid. So here they are then:

1. The right to property

2. Freedom of expression

3. Freedom of association

4. Freedom of contract

5. Freedom of belief

Because you are all stupid, I bet you haven't noticed that:

Holocaust Denial is THOUGHTCRIME.

Incitement to racial hatred is THOUGHTCRIME.

Incitement to religious hatred is THOUGHTCRIME.

Not hiring someone because you think she is the wrong sex is THOUGHTCRIME.

Not hiring someone because you don't like homosexuals is THOUGHTCRIME.

Not hiring someone disabled because you would rather not is THOUGHTCRIME.

Not hiring someone because you think he or she is too young or too old for the job is THOUGHTCRIME.

Not hiring someone because you don't like his or her religion is THOUGHTCRIME.

Hating is THOUGHTCRIME, folks. These fucking liberals are presuming to tell us whom we can and cannot HATE.

And you stupid fuckers put up with this sort of shit like the stupid fucking sheeple you are.

And these liberals who started the crap at the European Convention of Human Rights insist on the rightness and necessity of their thoughtcrimes while fining your government for not giving prisoners the right to vote.

And nobody notices how fucking stupid this is.

By the way, did you know that the Koran states that "There is no compulsion in belief"?

Bet you ignorant idiots didn't know that the Koran is more liberal than liberalism.


The reason why it doesn't seem that way is because most Muslims are too lazy and stupid to read the Koran, and too scared to question and discuss it with their fellow Muslims.

But are Muslims more stupid and lazy than Americans who don't know and don't care that their constitution has been flouted by successive governments?

The answer is NO.  Muslims are not more lazy and stupid than Americans who don't know and don't care that the US constitution is being flouted by successive US governments.   In fact, the US constitution is a damn sight shorter than the Koran.

I think being pussywhipped by Slut Single Mums makes you stupid, scared, skint, weak and despised, and white men are undeniably pussywhipped by Slut Single Mums.  The anti-immigrant political parties are actually the most pussywhipped because they are so pathetically grateful that any woman should turn up to their meetings that they want to court the female vote, forgetting that courting the female vote was what brought the nation and civilisation to its current degraded and dumbed-down state.

This is what happens when men abdicate power to the weaker sex.


Anonymous said…
You call people ignorant about the Qur'an yet you are blissfully ignorant of the fact that the verses you quote have been abrogated.

Google "Naskh" and you will find that the Meccan verses you quote are all disregarded by muslims because the Medinan verses - most of which call for violence against unbelievers "dirty kuffar" take precedence.

You should also understand that muslims do not just read the Qur'an for guidance, they have to read about how the "perfect example" of their prophet mohammed, a murderer, rapist, paedophile, torturer, liar, cheat, wife-beater, enslaver and misogynist practiced his faith.

You should also know that Islam is the only religion that advocates the death penalty for apostates.

Hope this helps.
Claire Khaw said…
I do not accept the authority of any Hadith that contradicts the Koran.

If you read the Koran, you will find that the penalty for apostasy is NOT death.
Anonymous said…
1. The Medinan verses are in the Qur'an, the word of Allah revealed to Mohammed in 622. The haddith does not override the Qur'an, it demonstrates how mohammed put those verses into action.

2. There are two verses that advocate death for apostates, 2:217 and 4:89.

3. Mohammed commanded it: "Whoever changed his Islamic religion, then kill him." Mentioned several times in the haddith.
Claire Khaw said…
YUSUFALI: They ask thee concerning fighting in the Prohibited Month. Say: "Fighting therein is a grave (offence); but graver is it in the sight of Allah to prevent access to the path of Allah, to deny Him, to prevent access to the Sacred Mosque, and drive out its members." Tumult and oppression are worse than slaughter. Nor will they cease fighting you until they turn you back from your faith if they can. And if any of you Turn back from their faith and die in unbelief, their works will bear no fruit in this life and in the Hereafter; they will be companions of the Fire and will abide therein.
PICKTHAL: They question thee (O Muhammad) with regard to warfare in the sacred month. Say: Warfare therein is a great (transgression), but to turn (men) from the way of Allah, and to disbelieve in Him and in the Inviolable Place of Worship, and to expel His people thence, is a greater with Allah; for persecution is worse than killing. And they will not cease from fighting against you till they have made you renegades from your religion, if they can. And whoso becometh a renegade and dieth in his disbelief: such are they whose works have fallen both in the world and the Hereafter. Such are rightful owners of the Fire: they will abide therein.
SHAKIR: They ask you concerning the sacred month about fighting in it. Say: Fighting in it is a grave matter, and hindering (men) from Allah's way and denying Him, and (hindering men from) the Sacred Mosque and turning its people out of it, are still graver with Allah, and persecution is graver than slaughter; and they will not cease fighting with you until they turn you back from your religion, if they can; and whoever of you turns back from his religion, then he dies while an unbeliever-- these it is whose works shall go for nothing in this world and the hereafter, and they are the inmates of the fire; therein they shall abide.

It just says they will go to hell where God will deal with them.
Claire Khaw said…
YUSUFALI: They but wish that ye should reject Faith, as they do, and thus be on the same footing (as they): But take not friends from their ranks until they flee in the way of Allah (From what is forbidden). But if they turn renegades, seize them and slay them wherever ye find them; and (in any case) take no friends or helpers from their ranks;-
PICKTHAL: They long that ye should disbelieve even as they disbelieve, that ye may be upon a level (with them). So choose not friends from them till they forsake their homes in the way of Allah; if they turn back (to enmity) then take them and kill them wherever ye find them, and choose no friend nor helper from among them,
SHAKIR: They desire that you should disbelieve as they have disbelieved, so that you might be (all) alike; therefore take not from among them friends until they fly (their homes) in Allah's way; but if they turn back, then seize them and kill them wherever you find them, and take not from among them a friend or a helper.

This quite clearly refers to a specific situation - the Jewish tribes that Mohammad was dealing with and who betrayed him.
Anonymous said…
Sorry you're completely wrong, your views are not shared by eminent Islamic scholars.

This article explains precisely how apostates are to be treated and that all four Islamic schools of jurisprudence endorse it.

Death Penalty For Apostates

And the verses you quoted do not specifically refer to Jews and even if the Jews did reject this vile pedophile, it certainly does not excuse the cruel and inhumane atrocities he and his army inflicted on them, especially the women and children.

There are no human rights in Islam, either for believers or unbelievers.
Claire Khaw said…
I don't care what these eminent Muslim scholars say. I am saying I interpret it that way, and if people like my interpretation, then they would support my version of Islam, which is Koran-based, and rejects all the shit in the Hadith that contradicts it, OK?
Anonymous said…
Again you show your ignorance. Interpretation is forbidden in Islam, it's called "bida" Google it.

Your interpretation is not Islam and therefore, not relevant. And nothing in the haddith contradicts the Qur'an, all you are doing is presenting a distorted personal version of Islam that muslims do not and will not follow.

The fact stands: The verses you quoted have been abrogated and the penalty for apostates in Islam is death.
Claire Khaw said…
Where does it say that the verse in question has been abrogated? The Hadith?
Jeremy Janson said…
"Sorry you're completely wrong, your views are not shared by eminent Islamic scholars."

Eminent scholars, LOL! One thing you quickly learn in Academia is that while professors are indeed extremely bright people, they don't always tell you the truth when they're saying what they've found to be true. The reality is that, and this is even more true in Liberal Arts and "soft science" fields such as Theology then in hard scientific, mathematical and engineering fields where objective standards serve as the final vote, what succeeds and gets you to be an "eminent scholar" is not what actually works or is truthful but rather what is popular.
Claire Khaw said…
"All things are subject to interpretation. Whichever interpretation prevails at a given time is a function of power and not truth." - Nietzsche

Popular posts from this blog

Divorced women who literally turn their sons into women

The 30 second rapist

Religion and Recreational Sex: sharia-compliant threesomes and mini-orgies?