How to DESTROY feminism in 7 easy steps

  1. abolish child benefit
  2. repeal the Sex Discrimination Act
  3. repeal the Equal Pay Act
  4. introduce compulsory marriage contracts
  5. reintroduce fault into divorce
  6. withdraw from the EU
  7. abolish the welfare state

Comments

Anonymous said…
Instead of abolishing the welfare state - we should introduce compulsatory "head of the family" to bring people in responsibility. Welfare should always be temporary but you can't deny sometimes people have no job and so no money for food and so on.
9 January 2012 at 17:56
Claire Khaw said…
There are always charities and soup kitchens.
9 January 2012 at 20:43
Adolfo said…
Steps to destroy RADICAL Feminism, useless and senseless androgynism, and the militant heterosexualization of homosexuals (nothing against homosexuals, though, my favorite author is homosexual –Gore Vidal)

1. Abolition of marriage (it means absolutely nothing these days, but a misandrist industry used by lawmakers, attorneys, media and politicians to exploit and denigrate men in a any possible way)
2. Introduction of the ‘Heterosexual Monogamous-Polygamous Civil Partnership for the raising of Children’. A civil contract which would forcibly include a ‘Divorce Contract’ (everything must be settled down from the very beginning).
3. Reintroduction and regulation of polygamy. The message would be clear and loud: ‘Winner takes it all’. If you are a successful male, if your game is high and tight, you can take as many wives and lovers as you can afford and you want to have, not worrying to be financially stripped in a family court.
4. Reshape of the Welfare State. Any industrial nation needs a Welfare State to function and be stable. The industry needs protection, the farmers need subsidies and Joe Six Pack, once in a while, needs an unemployment check. The most important thing is that the Welfare State is only to help the temporary unfortunate to lick their wounds, stand up, and fight back, not to create a permanent underclass.
5. Despenatlization of prostitution. By calling a spade a spade, both genders would get a healthier and more realistic perspective of human interactions. No fairy tales, no stupid religious expectations.
20 January 2012 at 18:25
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Domestic Partnership

I am now formally declaring that I have given up on love in the romantic sense, but not on love in the platonic and more enduring sense. Applications for the vacancy of a Domestic Partner - a cross between a housemate, critical friend and business partner - are invited. Sex and fidelity are optional, ie neither compulsory nor prohibited. Each "transaction" is deemed to be a one-off so that both parties are kept on their toes. There would be no assumption that either party would be spending, for example, St Valentine's Day with each other as a matter of course. So few people like this idea that the person, male or female, who says to me "My word, this is just the sort of relationship I have been looking for all my life!" without a hint of irony or sarcasm, would probably be The One . Domestic Partnership - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Domestic_partnership
Read more

The 30 second rapist

http://www.australian-news.com.au/anti_male.htm "Perth resident Kevin Ibbs was having consensual sex with Christine Watson on the night of 29 November 1986. Watson, a close friend of Ibbs's wife, Katrina Carter, was living in the same house with Ibbs and Carter. The sex act was taking place with the full knowledge of Carter who was in the house at the time. As Ibbs was nearing ejaculation, Watson suddenly withdrew her consent to sex (so she later claimed) and tried to push Ibbs away. He continued for a short time. Too late, he was trapped. He was charged with sexual assault and found guilty under the new law. The judge found that Ibbs had continued sexual intercourse for about thirty seconds without consent (for which he was later dubbed the 30-second rapist). The judge sentenced him to four years imprisonment." http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/HCA/1987/46.html "Some years later Watson admitted to police that the whole incident was a set-up orchestrated b...
Read more

Why white people are now an inferior race

We are what we are. We are what we believe and what we do - and that is infinitely changeable. This is a more constructive view of humanity than being what our skin says we are, according to the views of other people. White people are now an inferior race. Why are they an inferior race? Not because they are inherently inferior but they have allowed the feckless, promiscuous and unproductive of their number to breed in alarming numbers at the expense of white people who are productive and taxpaying. Five generations of white people have now been sexually reproduced in this way.  Five generations of the promiscuous, stupid, feckless and impecunious breeding and multiplying at taxpayers' expense with no politician in Parliament daring to criticise them. Family Allowances Act 1945 (when Child Benefit started) 2011 - 1945 = 66 One generation = 16 years 66 divided by 16 = 4.125 Say five generations of feckless fuckers. White people now have stupidity, promiscuity ...
Read more