The Battlefield of Love

Feminism makes middle class women with jobs and careers delay childbirth. A careerwoman also wants a better grade of spouse and will want someone at least equal to her. Basically, feminism makes a woman fussier while lowering the quality of men. That is why it is so insidious and pernicious.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1288045/Why-bimbos-like-late-Anna-Nicole-Smith-cleverer-seem.html The Best Truth is a Paradox. 

http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2009/nov/20/cameron-tory-government-promote-mumsnet Well, at least he is making noises to the effect that he is not too happy about these older mothers with their Down's Syndrome and autistic children (which they like boasting about) shoving their children in mainstream schools, suing the school for their very own special adult to pick up after them and follow them around, slowing things down for everyone.  If your kind is a retard then just send it to a School for Children with SENs, even if you think this might "stigmatise" it rather than drag us all down, you selfish bitches.  The teachers hate it too, because they are not trained to deal with your retard with its behavioural problems when there are already so many "normal" kids with behavioural problems.  http://www.senlegal.co.uk shows that suing your school to give your specially needier child a special carer and special privileges has now become a legal specialisa...

Feminism makes middle class women with jobs and careers delay childbirth. A careerwoman also wants a better quality of spouse, ie someone at least equal to her or superior to her in wealth. Basically, feminism makes a woman fussier while lowering the quality of men. That is why it is so insidious and pernicious.

because he thinks it is clever to be cowardly and displays other examples of twisted reasoning. He does not even have the excuse of youth, inexperience and the lack of a decent education, I am afraid, for he is a man with a white beard and his sentences indicate that he has had the benefit of a good education.  My contempt for this NeoCon knows no bounds.  http://www.facebook.com/thetodayprogramme?ref=ts Armed Forces minister: Cameron "is trying to avoid the confusion in some people's minds that it will be over in a matter of months". http://news.bbc.co.uk/today/hi/today/newsid_8764000/8764518.stm Helen Avery But we're going to pull out in the next couple of years according to Cameron, so civil war will come whenever we leave, surely? David Norris Helen - that is the irony - if the Taleban wanted us to leave they would stop fighting and lie low, giving us no reason to stay. Then we we left they would re-emerge and take over again. But at present...

Feminism + Consumerism + Female Promiscuity + Fatherlessness = Bloody Useless Illegitimate Children who are drug-addicted, under-achieving, promiscuous, obese, neurotic, unbiddable and full of STIs. You can imagine the quality of the next generation, and the generation after that etc ....  We are at the third generation now.  The fifth generation will probably only be fit for being sold as meat if we are not careful.   Look at that obese single mum you see waddling down your street.  What could she be fit for, apart from being a guest on the Jeremy Kyle Show?

A conversation this morning with a Chinese girlfriend of mine reveals her shock and horror at how cheap and easy British women are, and how spoilt British men are. Chinese women  really cannot compete. Chinese men know they would have woo a girl with hospitality, entertainment, gifts and good times, while British men know they can expect a blowjob on the first date (or should I say encounter?) without even buying her dinner. Monica Lewinsky didn't even expect anything from The Man Who Denied Having Sex With That Woman. I suppose it is a bit like unionised labour aghast at being dumped into and then finding itself drowning in a Sea of Scabs.

http://213.161.73.140/Talk/womens_rights/984374-Amazing-amount-of-anti-feminists-about-how-do-we-deal Just to let people know that I have an imposter.  Someone on Mumsnet calling herself "Mr Claire Khaw".  It is just so weird.

004.034 YUSUFALI: Men are the protectors and maintainers of women, because Allah has given the one more (strength) than the other, and because they support them from their means. Therefore the righteous women are devoutly obedient, and guard in (the husband's) absence what Allah would have them guard. As to those women on whose part ye fear disloyalty and ill-conduct, admonish them (first), (Next), refuse to share their beds, (And last) beat them (lightly); but if they return to obedience, seek not against them Means (of annoyance): For Allah is Most High, great (above you all). PICKTHAL: Men are in charge of women, because Allah hath made the one of them to excel the other, and because they spend of their property (for the support of women). So good women are the obedient, guarding in secret that which Allah hath guarded. As for those from whom ye fear rebellion, admonish them and banish them to beds apart, and scourge them. Then if they obey you, seek not a way a...

SEX IN THE CITY should be renamed SEX WITH WHORE-BITCHES WHO ARE DESTINED TO GROW OLD WITH THEIR PET.

I have asked Carrie Longton of Mumsnet to conduct the following survey, because I think it would be quite revealing. 1.  How many mothers on Mumsnet are working mothers 2.  How many of them are divorced 3.  How many of them were the ones who initiated their divorce 4.  How many of them are never-married mothers It is now 29 June.  What a shame she cannot bring herself to answer my question.  Perhaps an honest answer would be too embarrassingly revealing of the kind of motherhood the next generation of British children are obliged to suffer, as well as the customary fatherlessness of the typical British child?

"The gesture of a man opening a door for a woman illustrates how men and women relate. We all know that a woman can open a door herself. But when a man does it, he is affirming her femininity, beauty and charm. When she graciously accepts, she is validating his masculine power. This trade, a woman surrendering physical power in exchange for a man's protection (i.e. love) is the essence of heterosexuality. In order to develop emotionally, men and women need this mutual validation as much as sex itself. Sex is an expression of this exclusive contract. Under the toxic influence of feminism, women open their own doors. Neither sexual identity is validated; neither sex matures emotionally. Men feel redundant and impotent; women feel rejected and unloved."

004.034 YUSUFALI: Men are the protectors and maintainers of women, because Allah has given the one more (strength) than the other, and because they support them from their means. Therefore the righteous women are devoutly obedient, and guard in (the husband's) absence what Allah would have them guard. As to those women on whose part ye fear disloyalty and ill-conduct, admonish them (first), (Next), refuse to share their beds, (And last) beat them (lightly); but if they return to obedience, seek not against them Means (of annoyance): For Allah is Most High, great (above you all). PICKTHAL: Men are in charge of women, because Allah hath made the one of them to excel the other, and because they spend of their property (for the support of women). So good women are the obedient, guarding in secret that which Allah hath guarded. As for those from whom ye fear rebellion, admonish them and banish them to beds apart, and scourge them. Then if they obey you, seek not a wa...

Past atrocities committed by one group to another can be symbolically paid for by allowing a member of the wronged group to choose a female member of the perpetrator group for sex.  This would probably be a famous actress or pop star. This woman would name her price.  This would be paid for by the perpetrator group The transaction would be carried out at an appointed time and place. The world would be a more peaceful place and the woman who prostituted herself a much richer woman. Does anyone have any exotic combinations they would like to suggest to show they understand the concept?  (I can think of Osama bin Laden asking for Lady Gaga, or perhaps Nick Griffin asking for Mishal Husain, the renowned Pakistani beauty capable of reducing men into wobbling jellies of lust by a mere flash of her eyes.)

Most women are Nanny Statists. There were not reds under the beds but the reds lying seductively on beds. And so Western civilisation has been seduced by these sirens. The devastation to its morals, society and economy are everywhere to be seen, like mulched up confetti on the pavement after the rain ....

Most women want a nanny state, most women are "liberal", most women are censorious, most women are easily offended, interfering, micromanaging, attention-seeking, vindictive, petty-minded, neurotic, self-obsessed, indiscriminately compassionate and masochistically tolerant. Does this sound familiar? Have these feminine vices manifested itself in our society? Women are half the electorate after all, and the political classes are now too emasculated and gutless to say boo to these nanny-statists.  Is anyone else thinking of regime change? I suggest we do this by indirectly discriminating against women by making it a requirement that only taxpayers can have the vote.  That would automatically exclude most whingeing parasitical women who want higher taxes and more regulation to protect them from themselves and their unwanted pregnancies of illegitimate children. This also explains why, although most people agree with BNP policies, they are somehow prevented from voting ...

My letter should reach him today. I am eagerly awaiting his response.

Mumsnet users are gloating that I have been banned from their Facebook group and my comments deleted.  You will no longer be able to read my pertinent and incisive comments about Mumsnet whingeing for free nappies for their disabled children ( Special needs and nappy provision: click here to pester the PM - 10 June 2010) or why women are so critical of feminism (10 June 2010).  Someone asked me what Mumsnet was and this is my answer: A website for parasitical mothers who are always asking for more handouts from the state because they have messed up their lives. They are usually working, divorced or unmarried mothers, like most mothers in this country.  They embody what is wrong with British motherhood and are the reason why this country cannot have lower taxes and smaller government: because women are always whingeing for more state benefit and regulation.  They constitute half the electorate, whom the political classes are only too frightened of alienating....

http://www.beachblanket.co.uk/home.html Guys, this is a good place to go if you want to pick up a classy-looking bird. When my girlfriend asked for a Proseco I thought I would have one too: £18. Girls, don't even bother going there. You will be completely out-numbered by the other pretty girls, but go if you are looking to pick up a girl too.

I realised this when I find the male political establishment deferring to these harridans and then be found wanting anyway. I mean, talking about the kind of underwear you wear just to satisfy the curiosity of these women was pretty low, wasn't it? http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/politics/article1081586.ece Imagine a male politician asking a woman what sort of knickers she wears.  Only when these women are disenfranchised will we ever have a hope of getting small government, lower taxes and lighter regulations. These bitches are forever aggressively shaking their begging bowls in the faces of the male political establishment, who are too gutless and stupid to tell them how and where to go fuck themselves.

What a pity then employers are forced to employ these women instead of giving the work to men. Freedom of contract, anyone? Repealing the Sex Discrimination and Equal Pact Acts will soon sort these bitches out. 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_feminism It's Catholics reinventing the wheel! The religion most capable of  promoting family values now is Islam. The ideology most poisonous to family values is liberalism and feminism. The religion most conducive to family values is Islam.  It acknowledges the right of wives to divorce their husbands. Catholics have to annul their marriages, ie pretend it never happened. Wives of Orthodox Jews need to apply for a divorce whose consent may be withheld by the husband.  Which is the more female-friendly religion?

Arthur Hugh Clough (1819-1861)           The Latest Decalogue     Thou shalt have one God only; who     Would tax himself to worship two?     God's image nowhere shalt thou see,     Save haply in the currency:     Swear not at all; since for thy curse     Thine enemy is not the worse:     At church on Sunday to attend     Will help to keep the world thy friend:     Honor thy parents; that is, all     From whom promotion may befall:     Thou shalt not kill; but needst not strive     Officiously to keep alive:     Adultery it is not fit     Or safe, for women, to commit:     Thou shalt not steal; an empty feat,     When 'tis so lucrative to cheat:     False witness not to bear be strict;     And cautious, ere you contradict.     Thou shalt not covet; but tr...

Sir Stuart Rose Marks & Spencer Waterside House 35 North Wharf Road London W2 1NW 11 June 2010 Dear Sir Stuart DOMESTIC PARTNERSHIP “It is a truth universally acknowledged, that a single man in possession of a good fortune, must be in want of a wife.” But I have something even better than that to offer you. http://thebattlefieldoflove.blogspot.com/search?q=domestic+partnership It is a contract of cohabitation with optional sex and optional fidelity. This means it is neither prohibited nor compulsory. Such a contract cannot be entered into with the intention of having a physical relationship, nor can it be terminated on grounds relating to any physical relationship that may arise. It is contracted purely for reasons of convenience, economy, companionship and security. While I am aware you may not wish for such a limited contract, I do assure you that it has great potential and offers greater protection for the assets of the wealthier partner. I am responsible for: http://www.1party...

http://e-activist.com/ea-campaign/clientcampaign.do?ea.client.id=6&ea.campaign.id=6713&ea.param.extras=urltracker:mumsnet Mothers of disabled children are asking for nappies for their children to be provided at taxpayer expense. If they want to have their disabled children they can pay for the damn nappies themselves. If only Cameron would just tell them to go fuck themselves.

024.033 YUSUFALI : Let those who find not the wherewithal for marriage keep themselves chaste, until Allah gives them means out of His grace. And if any of your slaves ask for a deed in writing (to enable them to earn their freedom for a certain sum), give them such a deed if ye know any good in them: yea, give them something yourselves out of the means which Allah has given to you. But force not your maids to prostitution when they desire chastity, in order that ye may make a gain in the goods of this life. But if anyone compels them, yet, after such compulsion, is Allah, Oft-Forgiving, Most Merciful (to them), PICKTHAL : And let those who cannot find a match keep chaste till Allah give them independence by His grace. And such of your slaves as seek a writing (of emancipation), write it for them if ye are aware of aught of good in them, and bestow upon them of the wealth of Allah which He hath bestowed upon you. Force not your slave-girls to whoredom that ye ...

1. Women are always right. 2. Men are always wrong 3. Women are right even when they are wrong. 4. Men are wrong even when they are right.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matriarchy In 19 th century western scholarship, the hypothesis of matriarchy representing an early stage of human development — now mostly lost in prehistory, with the exception of some " primitive " societies — enjoyed popularity. The hypothesis survived into the 20 th century and was notably advanced in the context of feminism and especially second wave feminism , but this hypothesis of matriarchy as "merely" an early stage of human development is mostly discredited today. Of course feminists would seek to deny that condoning female promiscuity will not result in barbarism when it is already clear that Free Love is the cause of the decline and fall of Western civilisation. Being a feminist means you want the same rights as men. This inevitably means screwing around with men the way men screw around with women without being called sluts and whores. Once you let women screw around they will start having their little bastard...

Chastity, followed by marriage, followed by fidelity, was a wing-ding of a social construction, because it controlled men by giving them a small market-share of carnality. Marriage was a trap all be it a honey-trap, for men , not women. It was devised by men, with but one goal —to provide the best possible template for successfully raising children, as many children as possible, in an under-populated world. Marriage is a triumph of man’s civil conscience over his instinct to rut with every nubile female that he can outrun over ten miles. The Feminazi were right, it was a patriarchal construct, but it was forced on men, by other men, with the carrot of regular, if limited, sex, and the big, vengeful stick of tribal exclusion or worse for those who demurred. It was pure patriarchal altruism, a triumph of civilised man over base instinct. Marriage was constructed for one purpose only- the successful raising of children. It was a sacred covenant made between ...

From page 6 of the May 2010 issue of Searchlight. His statements [ ie Jeffrey Marshall's] are likely to go down badly especially amongst women, who are anyway much less likely to vote BNP than men. Would anyone care to explain why women are less likely to vote BNP than men? I think it may be something to do with the feminine vices of hypocrisy, cowardice, self-interest, obsession with status rather than with doing the right thing. Women are after all more censorious and easily offended than men. Being the weaker sex, they are less ready to forgive. Being the weaker sex they prefer, like children, to have the benefit of comforting lies. This makes them deny the truth. The truth is of course that women have no use for lower class men who can't compete with foreigners and who are members of a pariah party. Like Liberals, women would cling to their self-image of being tolerant and compassionate rather than deal effectively with any problem that needs dealing with. They get ...