Did Adam Lanza's father or mother petition for divorce?

http://www.washingtonpost.com/local/for-lanza-family-son-adams-difficulties-dominated/2012/12/17/3c0e8eb0-4890-11e2-ad54-580638ede391_story.html

So this woman who sought treatment for multiple sclerosis and who had a difficult son thought she would be better off as a single mother, did she?

What is she: dumb or crazy?



Nancy Lanza divorced Adam’s father, Peter, in 2008. Peter Lanza, now a vice president of taxes for GE Energy Financial Services, agreed to annual alimony payments that started at $240,000 and would have reached $298,800 in 2015.

The couple had married on June 6, 1981, in Kingston, N.H. — where Adam Lanza was born — and the divorce hit Peter Lanza hard, his lawyer said.

“He was very upset that he was getting divorced, but he didn’t want to take it out on anybody,” said attorney Gary Oberst.

Read more: http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/adam-lanza-20-deeply-disturbed-kid-article-1.1220752#ixzz2F8JgDuVh



"Nancy Jean Lanza sued Peter John Lanza for divorce on November 24, 2008 -- three days before Thanksgiving, Connecticut court records show."

So it was the dirty little gold-digger who divorced her husband three days before Thanksgiving.

Got that, folks?

The guns were hers too.


http://edition.cnn.com/2012/12/15/us/connecticut-lanza-family-profile/index.html

If the Americans give up their right to bear arms for a crazy bitch of a bad mother, they be crazy bitches too.   

If you were a mother who had a son who was a bit difficult and considered odd, do you think divorcing your husband would help you be a better parent to your disturbed son, or a worse parent?

If you answered the above question wrong, is it because you are stupid or because you are selfish or simply vindictive?

If you are stupid or selfish or vindictive are you like to be a good mother or a bad mother?

Why is the entire West so neurotically unwilling to point the finger at Nancy Lanza and bad mothers?

Why are MEN so afraid of criticising bad mothers? What the fuck is the matter with them?

It is infuriating that they seem transfixed by a collective inability to question the morals of this woman who was clearly a bad mother and a crazy lady barfly who was also a dirty little gold-digger.   

https://www.facebook.com/pages/Was-Adam-Lanza-a-victim-of-bad-mothering-and-no-fault-divorce/257704144358446



HELP ME ANNOY THE FEMALE-DOMINATED PC BBC

Would you like to nominate Claire Khaw for the iPM New Year Honour for being the most entertainingly philosophical, political and theological Woman of the Year?  Go on, go on, go on!

They won't let me win, but you will succeed in annoying them if the nominations keep coming in.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b0089nbb/features/new-year-honour

Comments

Anonymous said…
Claire - have you ever been married?

Obviously not - as if you had, you would understand that sometimes things don't work out. You do not know the full circumstances so presuming to judge in this way just shows you up as stupid.
27 December 2012 at 23:08
Claire Khaw said…
I am already aware that people get divorced for a variety of reasons.

At no time have I proposed that divorce should be abolished.

What I have actually said is that no-fault divorce should be abolished.
27 December 2012 at 23:18
Arthur Weiss said…
Nobody gets divorced if there is no fault involved. There is always a reason. However that doesn't mean it needs to be aired in public for all to know and see, or to make lawyers rich.

It is much more sensible to sort out differences amicably - remembering that you were once in love. Any other approach is irrational, stupid and only acts to make the ex-partners poorer and the lawyers richer.

In fact, lawyers LOVE it when a couple try and fight it out to prove where fault lies. (In reality it is ALWAYS a bit on both sides. E.g. if a man commits adultery and so the wife sues for divorce, she should ask herself why her husband felt the need to commit adultery. It will not be 100% the husband's fault)
27 December 2012 at 23:38
Claire Khaw said…
I think divorce should be stigmatised or you will encourage dirty little gold-diggers like Nancy Lanza.

I am surprised that a Jew cannot see the dangers of no-fault divorce.
27 December 2012 at 23:43
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

My interpretation of that wife-beating verse 4:34

Image
004.034 YUSUFALI: Men are the protectors and maintainers of women, because Allah has given the one more (strength) than the other, and because they support them from their means. Therefore the righteous women are devoutly obedient, and guard in (the husband's) absence what Allah would have them guard. As to those women on whose part ye fear disloyalty and ill-conduct, admonish them (first), (Next), refuse to share their beds, (And last) beat them (lightly); but if they return to obedience, seek not against them Means (of annoyance): For Allah is Most High, great (above you all). PICKTHAL: Men are in charge of women, because Allah hath made the one of them to excel the other, and because they spend of their property (for the support of women). So good women are the obedient, guarding in secret that which Allah hath guarded. As for those from whom ye fear rebellion, admonish them and banish them to beds apart, and scourge them. Then if they obey you, seek not a wa
Read more

The 30 second rapist

http://www.australian-news.com.au/anti_male.htm "Perth resident Kevin Ibbs was having consensual sex with Christine Watson on the night of 29 November 1986. Watson, a close friend of Ibbs's wife, Katrina Carter, was living in the same house with Ibbs and Carter. The sex act was taking place with the full knowledge of Carter who was in the house at the time. As Ibbs was nearing ejaculation, Watson suddenly withdrew her consent to sex (so she later claimed) and tried to push Ibbs away. He continued for a short time. Too late, he was trapped. He was charged with sexual assault and found guilty under the new law. The judge found that Ibbs had continued sexual intercourse for about thirty seconds without consent (for which he was later dubbed the 30-second rapist). The judge sentenced him to four years imprisonment." http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/HCA/1987/46.html "Some years later Watson admitted to police that the whole incident was a set-up orchestrated b
Read more

Verse in Koran implicitly accepts the existence of brothels

024.033 YUSUFALI : Let those who find not the wherewithal for marriage keep themselves chaste, until Allah gives them means out of His grace. And if any of your slaves ask for a deed in writing (to enable them to earn their freedom for a certain sum), give them such a deed if ye know any good in them: yea, give them something yourselves out of the means which Allah has given to you. But force not your maids to prostitution when they desire chastity, in order that ye may make a gain in the goods of this life. But if anyone compels them, yet, after such compulsion, is Allah, Oft-Forgiving, Most Merciful (to them), PICKTHAL : And let those who cannot find a match keep chaste till Allah give them independence by His grace. And such of your slaves as seek a writing (of emancipation), write it for them if ye are aware of aught of good in them, and bestow upon them of the wealth of Allah which He hath bestowed upon you. Force not your slave-girls to whoredom that ye
Read more