23 Reasons for repealing the Sex Discrimination Act 1975
http://yourfreedom.hmg.gov.uk/repealing-unnecessary-laws/repeal-the-sex-discrimination-act-1975-1/idea-view
because women
- have too much power
- are always asking for more state handouts
- want to mother everything, no matter how useless and costly, because it feeds their sense of self-important and purpose
- are the people who are stopping the rest of us from getting lower taxes and lighter regulation, because our male politicians take orders from these people who make up the membership of MUMSNET and listeners of WOMAN'S HOUR. (Notice how they are always whingeing, asking for more state handouts, and more nannying health and safety legislation. Can you imagine a man asking for smoking to be banned?)
- who are single mothers are parasitical on the taxpayer when they have no husband to provide for them
- are in thrall to feminism - an evil unnatural ideology that requires you to pretend that both sexes are capable of doing the same work with equal competence and effectiveness, when they are clearly not
- are mostly more irrational than men
- are more censorious than men
- are less likely to forgive than men because they are the weaker sex and their feelings are more easily hurt, ie they are more vindictive
- and their feminine vices have started to infect men. (Remember when David Milliband said he was "offended" by the behaviour of Iran when he was Foreign Secretary? Why does he imagine for a moment that the Iranians or anyone cares about his feelings? He was talking like a girl and thinking like one too.)
- are the ones who want more nannying health and safety regulations
- are the ones who want to be bailed out when they have messed up their lives because they got knocked up by some low-life loser they didn't say no to
- are not very good at using contraception or deliberately get pregnant to trap the man or the taxpayer into paying for her and her child or children
- are interfering
- should do what they are best at and leave the thinking to men or rational women who want greater liberty, fewer laws and lower taxes
- are the reds on (rather than under) your bed
- are naturally parasitical, as well as cowardly and hypocritical
- exercising matriarchal degeneracy will lead to terminal matriarchal dementia
- matriarchal dementia leads to civilisational extinction
- are only too good at exercising power without responsibility
- are corrupted by the power they do not deserve to have
- have emasculated men and forced them to ape the manners and morals of those who have conquered them
- with too much power are bad for themselves, men, children and the next generation
Comments
WTF?
If they honestly think that women in Afghanistan will be 'freed' by intervention, they should stop dreaming. The NATO forces are incapable of even eradicating the drug production there, how able would they be dealing with centuries old cultural traditions?
Pointless trying to educate you or Leos.
C.L.Villiers
CLV.
If it's pointless, why even bother with us?
What a shame most people don't realise that all anti-discrimination legislation is *thoughtcrime*.
What do you think is going to happen anyway?
Employers will just give the job to people they think is the best person for the job.
CLV.
Perhaps you should be thanking the feminists for allowing you to spout these ideas.
Sonja Buyers.
Most women, probably because they are happy not to vote, and because they won't be paying taxes because they are wives and mothers, will in practice not vote.
The awful truth is that women aren't much interested in politics and use the fact that they are women to excuse their political ignorance and apathy.
Indeed, I know a female friend who did exactly that. "I am girl," she said, "what do you expect?"
Women and men are not equally good at doing certain things.
Only the unnatural and truth-denying ideology of feminism would wish to make an issue out of this biological fact.
If you love women you should join ranks with us, libertarians and anti-feminists. Feminism also hurt women.
Speaking of your vision of the past where women were not articulate and essentially voiceless. This is a myth, pick up any 19th century novel written by a woman.
And by 'voice' I don't simply mean the odd author, woman of wealth, I am speaking of a general and blanket right to be heard. Educating women, giving then property rights....
So obtuse.
I failed to spot anyone 'on your side' and clever.
How so?
"Sex discrimination is not thought crime. It's the act of discrimination, the evidence of discrimination can only be seen in action."
We are forbidden to act on our opinions.
Discrimination requires thought, does it not?
You must be kidding. What about the vast numbers of men of no wealth? Did they have a voice?
Do you really want to live in a society that wastes men's talents and confines them to uselessness, criminality and unemployment?
It would appear that feminism is the ideology that is happy to squander the lives and talents of men and ruthlessly sacrifice the quality of the next generation so women can have the freedom to work, which most don't want anyway. That is why it is both stupid and evil.