How Islam would arrest the qualitative and numerical decline of the white race and offer something for lesbians ...
Some BNP activists feels that single mums must not be attacked because they at least add to the numbers of white people in this country.
I refer them to Tim Winter AKA Abdal Hakim Murad's essay http://www.missionislam.com/family/fall_of_family.htm
It is not the numbers but the quality of the white race that is important, in my view.
I refer them to Tim Winter AKA Abdal Hakim Murad's essay http://www.missionislam.com/family/fall_of_family.htm
It is not the numbers but the quality of the white race that is important, in my view.
Single parenthood diminishes the quality of the next generation. The ideal is two married biological parents ie family values, to pass on any kind of social and cultural identity to the next generation that is decent and productive. If not you will get ever-lowering standards of morality and education until you get to the situation where no British employer wants to hire a British school-leaver if they can possibly avoid it, which is now the case.
It is the culture that needs to be improved. The more little bastards you have the more likely you are go downhill and be taken by other cultures.
The British managed to colonise other countries while having relatively few personnel.
Quality is more important than mere numbers.
In any case if most white men became Muslim, had 4 wives each and children within wedlock, the stock of the white race could easily be replenished.
At this point, it was pointed out that "We're not in a position to be fussy, it's a numbers game."
What some of these concerned race nationalists are prescribing, ie indiscriminate unmarried breeding by white people, is in fact "hair of the dog", because what they are prescribing is more vermin breeding vermin, which is already happening anyway.
The poor and the stupid are already breeding with each other at taxpayers' expense.
The only way to correct the situation is this:
First, you challenge feminism and liberalism.
Second, you defeat these twin ideologies.
Third, you replace it with an ideology that actually practices family values.
Say 4 wives, 4 children each who in turn have 4 wives and 4 children each.
Better than those variously-fathered little bastards by verminous sluts and slappers.
The former will have a sense of identity as well as family and clan loyalty, led by a patriarch.
The latter will be atomised, divided, with no male figure to identify themselves with, easily picked off one by one ...
But what if one husband cannot sexually satisfy 4 wives, a thoughtful and attentive woman asked?
If a single man cannot satisfy 4 women, then it may be that these 4 women will have to look to each other for their sexual needs.
There is an interesting verse in the Koran
4:15
http://www.usc.edu/schools/college/crcc/engagement/resources/texts/muslim/quran/004.qmt.html
that says that any lewd act between women requires 4 reliable witnesses before a conviction is possible.
If a husband's 4 wives were to indulge in a lascivious and lewd lesbian orgy, none of them could collectively incriminate any of the others, simply because there wouldn't be enough witnesses.
It is also quite possible that a Muslim husband witnessing such a lascivious lesbian orgy held by his wives for his benefit would suddenly find the urge to satisfy both himself and all his wives.
If his spirit is willing but the flesh be flaccid, then they still have the option of satisfying each other.
And then all would be gratified and satisfied.
So it would be all right then and perhaps even halal, if kept within the family, so to speak.
I see nothing wrong with this very practical situation that allows lesbians to have children at the expense of their husband while being able to enjoy continuing opportunities to indulge their sexual preference.
The more I think about it, the more I think that an Islamic Revolution in Britain is not only possible but actually desirable and would be a Good Thing, capable of adding to the colour and, er, gaiety of the nation. ...
Anjem Choudary can be found at http://www.anjemchoudary.com/ and I wonder if it is worth discussing such practical details with him.
It is the culture that needs to be improved. The more little bastards you have the more likely you are go downhill and be taken by other cultures.
The British managed to colonise other countries while having relatively few personnel.
Quality is more important than mere numbers.
In any case if most white men became Muslim, had 4 wives each and children within wedlock, the stock of the white race could easily be replenished.
At this point, it was pointed out that "We're not in a position to be fussy, it's a numbers game."
My response was that having more little bastards will make the white race go downhill faster.
I have already made the point that it is not about numbers but about cultural and technological superiority that allowed the white man to rule the world once.
If all you are going to do is have even more illiterate, innumerate, illegitimate feral youth to overwhelm state schools and ruin it for others who want to learn, then you might as well not bother.
I have already made the point that it is not about numbers but about cultural and technological superiority that allowed the white man to rule the world once.
If all you are going to do is have even more illiterate, innumerate, illegitimate feral youth to overwhelm state schools and ruin it for others who want to learn, then you might as well not bother.
What some of these concerned race nationalists are prescribing, ie indiscriminate unmarried breeding by white people, is in fact "hair of the dog", because what they are prescribing is more vermin breeding vermin, which is already happening anyway.
The poor and the stupid are already breeding with each other at taxpayers' expense.
The only way to correct the situation is this:
First, you challenge feminism and liberalism.
Second, you defeat these twin ideologies.
Third, you replace it with an ideology that actually practices family values.
Say 4 wives, 4 children each who in turn have 4 wives and 4 children each.
Better than those variously-fathered little bastards by verminous sluts and slappers.
The former will have a sense of identity as well as family and clan loyalty, led by a patriarch.
The latter will be atomised, divided, with no male figure to identify themselves with, easily picked off one by one ...
But what if one husband cannot sexually satisfy 4 wives, a thoughtful and attentive woman asked?
If a single man cannot satisfy 4 women, then it may be that these 4 women will have to look to each other for their sexual needs.
There is an interesting verse in the Koran
4:15
http://www.usc.edu/schools/college/crcc/engagement/resources/texts/muslim/quran/004.qmt.html
that says that any lewd act between women requires 4 reliable witnesses before a conviction is possible.
YUSUFALI: If any of your women are guilty of lewdness, Take the evidence of four (Reliable) witnesses from amongst you against them; and if they testify, confine them to houses until death do claim them, or Allah ordain for them some (other) way.
PICKTHAL: As for those of your women who are guilty of lewdness, call to witness four of you against them. And if they testify (to the truth of the allegation) then confine them to the houses until death take them or (until) Allah appoint for them a way (through new legislation).
SHAKIR: And as for those who are guilty of an indecency from among your women, call to witnesses against them four (witnesses) from among you; then if they bear witness confine them to the houses until death takes them away or Allah opens some way for them.
If a husband's 4 wives were to indulge in a lascivious and lewd lesbian orgy, none of them could collectively incriminate any of the others, simply because there wouldn't be enough witnesses.
It is also quite possible that a Muslim husband witnessing such a lascivious lesbian orgy held by his wives for his benefit would suddenly find the urge to satisfy both himself and all his wives.
If his spirit is willing but the flesh be flaccid, then they still have the option of satisfying each other.
And then all would be gratified and satisfied.
So it would be all right then and perhaps even halal, if kept within the family, so to speak.
I see nothing wrong with this very practical situation that allows lesbians to have children at the expense of their husband while being able to enjoy continuing opportunities to indulge their sexual preference.
The more I think about it, the more I think that an Islamic Revolution in Britain is not only possible but actually desirable and would be a Good Thing, capable of adding to the colour and, er, gaiety of the nation. ...
Anjem Choudary can be found at http://www.anjemchoudary.com/ and I wonder if it is worth discussing such practical details with him.
Comments
I only mentioned it to allay the fears of anxious members of the white race who fear becoming a racial minority in their own country.
To beat Asian Muslims qualitatively and numerically, you use the Koran, which is an ideology that promotes family values.
Obviously, allowing men to have 4 wives would help the white race replenish itself when their numbers fall to precariously low levels.
Thus it will be proven that a thing one dislikes (in this case the fear and hatred of white liberals and nationalists towards Islam and Muslims) could in the long run prove to be a good thing ...
Genius! This proposal reminds me a book I read some years ago “The Polygamous Sex” by Esther Vilar. In that piece Vilar elaborates that since a man’s love for a woman is based on two driving forces, sexual desire and the will to provide and protect to his children’s mother, every man should have the right to have at least two wives: one to be his children’s mother, one to be the mistress. Now, this proposal is good for everyone. It’s good for women who complain that good and worthy men are scarce. It’s good for men who always fantasize about having an harem. It’s good for a career woman who by being part of this arrangement can have children being confident that her sister wives will take good care of her children while she resumes her career. It’s good for a real socialist because it could become an excellent mechanism of wealth redistribution. A wealthy man, let’s say a billionaire athlete or celebrity can afford not four but more wives. There can be a work division among them. Some wives would play as mothers and homemakers, others as sexual providers. Even if this man would have an affair outside his harem the rage would dilute among many women. Forty years later when he dies his obscene fortune will be partitioned among tens of children and wives spreading a lot of means like a pyramid. Good option, it just need to be polished.
Yours.
Having 4 wives would in that situation be an act of self-sacrifice for the public good and the nation then.
It may even be rewarded by an Islamic BNP government of the day with honours, tax breaks and glory. Who knows what the future may bring?
That would be the perfect compromise then. BNP supporters and activists would feel reassured that they are not about to become racially outnumbered with an improved quality of white person, and the Muslims would be delighted that the BNP of all people have decided to adopt their religion.
Atheist though I am, it is now quite clear to me that people need religion to keep them on the straight and narrow. It would be in the national interest to establish a new national religion - a Mosque of Britain perhaps - now that the Anglican Church is no longer fit for purpose.
It is the only way of saving Western civilisation from its most destructive forces. The BNP think that it is Islam that threatens Western civilisation but really, it is the sexual incontinence of the white race which they are now to feeble to denounce. The men are afraid of offending feminists, and feminists support female promiscuity by refusing to condemn single mums.
If they remember anything of the Bible these days, they would know that LUST is one of the deadly sins.
The enemy on this occasion is within our knickers and our trousers ...