Wednesday, 7 March 2012

Gay "Marriage"


  1. I am not saying same sex couples should not commit the sex acts they want to commit with each other over a long period of time while living together.   All I am saying is that they should not call it "marriage".
  2. Children often talk about marrying each other when they have decided that they like each other.  It seems that the Prime Minister's understanding of marriage has now degenerated into this infantile misapprehension.
  3. A same-sex couple wanting to marry each other is as absurd as a man wanting to wear a bra or a woman wanting to wear a codpiece.   
  4. A same-sex couple (or even an unmarried heterosexual couple) should accept that there is no obligation to stay together if just one of them decides it is over.   They would not need rights against each other in the same way that an abandoned wife with children would deserve support from her errant and faithless husband.   
  5. Marriage was not created for the purpose of couples of any kind to say they love each other.  It was a sacred contract (whether or not you believe in God) created for men and women for the purposes of procreation and social stability.   Marriage was conceived of and practised by Homo Sapiens.  Neanderthal Man, who lived in a matriarchy, eventually became extinct when the superior social cohesion of Homo Sapiens comprehensively defeated and conquered him.   
  6. Marriage is an institution.   http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Institution  "An institution is any structure or mechanism of social order and cooperation governing the behavior of a set of individuals within a given human community. Institutions are identified with a social purpose and permanence, transcending individual human lives and intentions, and with the making and enforcing of rules governing cooperative human behavior."
  7. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rectification_of_names  "Confucius believed that social disorder often stemmed from failure to perceive, understand, and deal with reality. Fundamentally, then, social disorder can stem from the failure to call things by their proper names, and his solution to this was the rectification of names."  In short, we should call a spade a spade when it is a spade.  Calling a spade a spatula would only cause confusion and distress when a workmen is given a spatula and the cook is presented with a spade. 
  8. It is the intention of the atheist liberal elite to rub the faces of Jews, Christians and Jews in the poo of sodomy, because they think people who believe in God are stupid and wish to demonstrate their contempt for their religious feelings by turning the institution of marriage into a sex toy for same-sex couples.
  9. The tolerance of homosexuals and the equalisation of homosexual relationships with marriage means that that society is already degenerate and suffering from the advanced stages of civilisational dementia.   It is analogous to being a miner with a dead canary on his hands and is an omen that things are not well in your society and your civilisation, and that you should change course.   It is yet another conclusive sign that you are living in a matriarchy, and the only good matriarchy is a dead matriarchy.

Feminism is a cancer.  Gay marriage is a tumour.

1 comment:

Adolfo said...

I am so disappointed. I thought gay people were more intelligent than we, heterosexuals; or at least intelligent enough to not to want to tie the knot with another person; and instead of that spend their entire adult life in the finer things life can provide (nice food, traveling, books, sex, etc.) Haven’t they told them that along with gay marriage it comes gay divorce? Haven’t they told them that the most productive partner of a marriage is treated like a criminal in a family court? Haven’t they told them that getting married is putting yourself in a very dangerous legal and economic position?
Gay marriage is a stupid as two heterosexual elders (60+ y.o.) getting married. Since they are not going to have children, why should they do it? Economic Security? A Last Will or a Civil Contract can get the same legal effects. If it were up to me I would give up ‘Marriage’ to the LGBT community, aliens, dogs and any other living creature on Earth to do with it whatever they want with that worthless shit. Then I would concentrate to introduce in society ‘The HETEROSEXUAL Monogamic Polygamist Civil Contract for the raising of Children’.