Are Family Values Misogynistic?


Are family values "misogynistic"? I suppose feminists would think so. But is feminism good even for women?

Family values imposes onerous financial and social burdens on men too. It would make it more difficult for men to fuck and forget women who are not actually prostitutes. It basically redistributes the burden of duty.

Feminism lightens the social and financial burdens of men, and cheapens women by making more of them willing to shamelessly engage in meaningless sex.  Is feminism really beneficial for women who think in the long term though, when it seems most of them aren't really that into sex (ask most married men) and don't like the status of being childless spinsters?


Future dementia sufferers should bear in mind that they won't even have any children to find them a good home for the old, unwanted and demented whose existence are a burden to themselves and others. 

Comments

Adolfo said…
Andromeda,
Family values are more misandrist than misogynist. Marriage is a patriarchal institution imposed basically on men. Maleness and monogamy are opposites. Not long ago just a fraction of men fathered almost all the children, while almost all the women have offspring. That means that there were groups of women sharing a man at least for procreation purposes. Most of men used to die in bloody wars or performing dangerous tasks, so the ratio of women versus men was always high. Or simply, alpha males concentrated most of the wealth, and women, being hypergamic as they are, chose those dominant men over the less fortunate. By instituting marriage every man had a chance of having a family, while women were prevented from forming harems around the most successful males. In a way, marriage was a Communist institution without the Marxist background. Is Feminism good for women or society? Yes, if it is kept at its original claims (right to vote, equal opportunities, free and safe abortions) which I think are legitimate; societies are not static after all, also if such societies are industrialized. Which brings me to something I don’t quite understand: Why Feminism has been so devastating in England and the USA? I am a business consultant and have traveled a lot. I have been to France, the birthplace of liberalism, and other libertarian movements (feminism included), a “socialist” country under Anglo-Saxon standards and they don’t have that mess. Same thing I can say about Brazil, Cuba, or even Mexico, where I live. There must be something else. Maybe you (UK and USA) had always a matriarchy and feminism just allow you to “flourish”. My quick solution to this state of things: Masculinism! Restore male privileges, secure male promiscuity, so a small number of males could start fixing things. If family values were corrupted by the most insane brand of feminism, maybe it’s time to go back to the basics. It could be our last chance to preserve civilization.
Yours.
21 September 2010 at 19:29
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The 30 second rapist

http://www.australian-news.com.au/anti_male.htm "Perth resident Kevin Ibbs was having consensual sex with Christine Watson on the night of 29 November 1986. Watson, a close friend of Ibbs's wife, Katrina Carter, was living in the same house with Ibbs and Carter. The sex act was taking place with the full knowledge of Carter who was in the house at the time. As Ibbs was nearing ejaculation, Watson suddenly withdrew her consent to sex (so she later claimed) and tried to push Ibbs away. He continued for a short time. Too late, he was trapped. He was charged with sexual assault and found guilty under the new law. The judge found that Ibbs had continued sexual intercourse for about thirty seconds without consent (for which he was later dubbed the 30-second rapist). The judge sentenced him to four years imprisonment." http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/HCA/1987/46.html "Some years later Watson admitted to police that the whole incident was a set-up orchestrated b
Read more

My interpretation of that wife-beating verse 4:34

Image
004.034 YUSUFALI: Men are the protectors and maintainers of women, because Allah has given the one more (strength) than the other, and because they support them from their means. Therefore the righteous women are devoutly obedient, and guard in (the husband's) absence what Allah would have them guard. As to those women on whose part ye fear disloyalty and ill-conduct, admonish them (first), (Next), refuse to share their beds, (And last) beat them (lightly); but if they return to obedience, seek not against them Means (of annoyance): For Allah is Most High, great (above you all). PICKTHAL: Men are in charge of women, because Allah hath made the one of them to excel the other, and because they spend of their property (for the support of women). So good women are the obedient, guarding in secret that which Allah hath guarded. As for those from whom ye fear rebellion, admonish them and banish them to beds apart, and scourge them. Then if they obey you, seek not a wa
Read more

Verse in Koran implicitly accepts the existence of brothels

024.033 YUSUFALI : Let those who find not the wherewithal for marriage keep themselves chaste, until Allah gives them means out of His grace. And if any of your slaves ask for a deed in writing (to enable them to earn their freedom for a certain sum), give them such a deed if ye know any good in them: yea, give them something yourselves out of the means which Allah has given to you. But force not your maids to prostitution when they desire chastity, in order that ye may make a gain in the goods of this life. But if anyone compels them, yet, after such compulsion, is Allah, Oft-Forgiving, Most Merciful (to them), PICKTHAL : And let those who cannot find a match keep chaste till Allah give them independence by His grace. And such of your slaves as seek a writing (of emancipation), write it for them if ye are aware of aught of good in them, and bestow upon them of the wealth of Allah which He hath bestowed upon you. Force not your slave-girls to whoredom that ye
Read more