The Battlefield of Love

"There is object proof that homosexuality is more interesting than heterosexuality. It's that one knows a considerable number of heterosexuals who would wish to become homosexuals, whereas one knows very few homosexuals who would really like to become heterosexuals." —Michel Foucault "Men are run ragged by female sexuality all their lives. From the beginning of his life to the end, no man ever fully commands any woman. It's an illusion. Men are pussy-whipped. And they know it. That's what the strip clubs are about; not woman as victim, not woman as slave, but woman as goddess." —Camille Paglia "The feminist line is, strippers and topless dancers are degraded, subordinated, and enslaved; they are victims, turned into objects by the display of their anatomy. But women are far from being victims — women rule; they are in total control ... the feminist analysis of prostitution says that men are using money as power over women. I'd say, yes, ...

I was disabled from commenting on Facebook for saying: “All women are prostitutes, and all men are punters. This is no tragedy, for it was always ever thus. The tragedy for a woman is to sell herself too cheaply or to price herself right out of the market. The tragedy for a man is to not get value for his money or do the equivalent of buying a car he cannot afford to run.” Do you just get the feeling it was a woman who reported me?  I wonder if it is still allowed to say that, on the whole, it seems that women are more censorious than men. This is considered a worthy subject for discussion after all at http://uk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20110311020217AAYSFwV and at http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/the-scientific-fundamentalist/201103/are-all-women-essentially-prostitutes but you wouldn't expect a woman, especially if she is a slut , to agree, would you? Perhaps I should have just asked the question: “Are women prostitutes?” This would no doub...

It is not even in iambic pentameters. It is an insult to the men who entered the competition too.  I am sure she is very nice and charming and it was frightfully good of her to restrain herself from publishing the poems she wrote about her ex-husband who left her for another woman, but it is still SHIT poetry. Is this yet another conclusive sign that we live in a matriarchy, this privileging of MEDIOCRITY just because this woman was supposed to have suffered? I have a few old love poems I could inflict on my readership too, if I wanted to.  They are probably shit too, but not as shit as Sharon Olds'.   Sharon Olds - mutton dressed as lamb.  Could you bear it if your wife went around with her hair done like that? You can listen to her boring boring boring poem about her son at  http://news.bbc.co.uk/today/hi/today/newsid_9785000/9785165.stm   It really is SHIT. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-21016402 http://www.huffingtonpo...

Extracted from the psychologist Simon Sheppard's essay  SPREE KILLERS: THE FOREFRONT OF KNOWLEDGE  Heritage & Destiny January-February 2013 " ... it is clear that a significant proportion of spree killers possess some conscious racial awareness, as demonstrated by their known history, their comments at the time or their choice of targets. Tellingly, the victims of the  few black spree killers to date have been overwhelmingly white." "During his trial Breivik was declared sane. What this means is that there was an absence of psychosis; technically psychosis involves detachment from reality. So Breivik's actions were not just carefully and rationally planned: his scheme followed a logical, grim progression. Britain has no equivalent of America's NRA, and what advocates of gun freedom there are consist of a few specialist sportsmen.  Notwithstanding, the point has been made that in practically every case, the weapons for use by spree killers have b...

http://www.mensmindsmatter.com/ Look at the fonts.  They are intended to suggest the childish writing of a dyslexic child. Why was it done in this pathetic "I am a child and I am hurt, don't hurt me any more" way? Because the man who put this together is afraid of feminists and wishes to avoid their wrath. To be a man, one must fight . To fight, one must be bold and acquire strength, not whinge like a woman and say "I am only a woman, so please don't hurt me for saying that" as this contemptible webpage for men's mental health seems to be saying. Of course, whoever it is who started the page is FUCKED IN THE HEAD to even think of presenting the case for men in that contemptibly piteous way.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b01pp98c Teaching Compassion and Empathy to Children Are children naturally empathetic? Can you teach care and compassion?  Jenni speaks to  Nikkola Daniel , an   education consultant who works in schools, teaching social and emotional literacy and Elizabeth Hartley Brewer, author of a number of parenting books and child development expert.

Is the multiple orgasm a myth?  Is it experienced simultaneously or successively?  How do you know if it is different to an ordinary orgasm, if all orgasms come in waves? Is a multiple orgasm having more than one orgasm in one session of sex or in one act of intercourse? What is "one act of intercourse" - the duration of the tumescence of the male member from erection to ejaculation? Did some evil feminist make it up to make men feel inadequate and make women dissatisfied? I want those who claim to have experienced a multiple orgasm to explain how it is different to an ORDINARY one. http://www.femalefirst.co.uk/relationships/multiple+orgasms-36.html  defines a multiple orgasm viz: Being Multi-orgasmic, is it a fallacy, here are some of the details. Definition of multiple orgasms: experiencing orgasms within half a minute to a minute apart, which is quite close together. Each orgasm in a multiple session doesn't have to be earth shattering, it can be w...

Ulrika Jonsson: Why am I derided for being a 4x4 mum when dads like Rod Stewart (7x5) are heroes? http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-1273402/Ulrika-Jonsson-Why-I-derided-4x4-mum-dads-like-Rod-Stewart-7x5-heroes.html If you are the seller of sex you want the price high. If you are the buyer of sex you want the price low. If you are the buyer of sex and you can get it cheap you are considered lucky. If you are the seller of sex and you give it away for free when you could get a better deal, then you are STUPID SLUT. All sluts are stupid, so "stupid slut" is a PLEONASM like "tuna fish".

http://www2.lse.ac.uk/publicEvents/events/2013/02/20130214t1830vSZT.aspx Caren Grown is senior gender advisor in the Bureau of Policy, Planning and Learning, where she leads USAID’s efforts to integrate gender equality and female empowerment throughout the agency’s policies and programs. Is this woman either stupid or evil and should she be stopped? Is the Matriarchal West not already suffering from a surfeit of feminism, makings its people degenerate, its industries uncompetitive, its government incompetent and its institutions corrupt? Is it quite right to offer someone who is already intoxicated and suffering from cirrhosis of the liver more alcohol?  (Publicans and doctors will already know the correct answer to this question.) Date: Thursday 14 February 2013  Time: 6.30-8pm  Venue: Sheikh Zayed Theatre, New Academic Building LSE Houghton Street London WC2A 2AE Speaker: Dr Caren Grown http://thebattlefieldoflove.blogspot.co.uk/2012/07/too-man...

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2257379/Ive-lived-greatest-revolution-sexual-mores-history-damage-appals-me.html It seems that A N Wilson does not make the connection between extremist feminism and the Sex Revolution.         I do not know if this is through not seeing the connection or fearing to make the connection or a reluctance to point out that the Empress's New Clothes are not clothes at all and do not become her one bit. Which of the above is it, Andrew? A patriarchy is a society in which male promiscuity is condoned. A matriarchy is a society in which female promiscuity is condoned, and even encouraged.   A matriarchy is also a society in which even alpha males are afraid of criticising sluts, because sluts and bastards would then be in the majority.  Does any party leader of any political party in this country criticise sluts?  Of course not.  We know who is in power by those whom we cannot criticise: SLUTS.   Are...

Sally Feldman Sally Feldman  is on the editorial board of New Humanist and a trustee of the Rationalist Association. She is Head of the School of Media, Arts and Design at the University of Westminster, and used to edit Woman's Hour on BBC Radio 4. Sally Feldman: "Girls who giggle at the geography teacher attempting to stretch a condom over a Bunsen burner may well be enthralled at  Sugar 's blow-by-blow guide to oral sex. Unsuitable? Inappropriate? Not according to the Government, which is about to launch a new scheme that will include oral sex lessons, after a trial showed it was successful in helping to reduce sexual intercourse among 16–year olds." http://newhumanist.org.uk/756/why-im-glad-my-daughter-had-under-age-sex How long has this DISGUSTING and immoral woman been corrupting the morals of British women? How long did she work at Woman's Hour? She has certainly corrupted her daughter's, who is now officially a SLUT and a FORNI...

Was Patriarchy a Women's Scheme to Control Men? "Much has been said in feminist circles about how women are oppressed by patriarchy. Patriarchy literally means “rule by fathers” and is a system where men effectively are in control of property and decision-making. An important characteristic of patriarchal systems is that they are generally also patrilineal (a child’s descent is described by who his father, and father’s father were, rather than through the mother’s line). The question I'm putting forth here is: Does the patriarchal/patrilineal system act more to oppress women, or is it actually more a way for women to tap and control male energy? My assertion is that patriarchal society creates an incentive structure that enables women to harness male energy and initiative for the benefit of women and their children. In classic patriarchal cultures, men are motivated to amass wealth through the acquisition and enhancement of productive facilities: land, ships, b...

http://www.marriagefoundation.org.uk/Web/Content/Default.aspx?Content=426 Conference in London, February 15th, 2013       Book a ticket here. http://www.marriagefoundation.org.uk/Web/OnlineStore/Product.aspx?ID=142&RedirectUrl=~%2fWeb%2fOnlineStore%2fProducts.aspx%3fCatID%3d11 Cost: £40 and a day off work to exclude  most people. "Modern Marriage: Myths, Realities and Prospects" Playing to our strength as the authoritative organisation for up-to-date research on marriage in the UK, we are staging this important conference on February 15th, 2013. The future of marriage is clouded by the prevalence of many myths and a conspiracy of silence around some key issues. This conference therefore explores the myths and realities that currently shape both debate about marriage and the choices of people as they form and dissolve relationships.The Conference is being held in the London HQ of Notre Dame University at 1 Suffolk Street, SW1Y 4HG, just off Trafalgar ...

http://m.guardian.co.uk/politics/2013/jan/03/diane-abbott-fast-food-curb  was what The Guardian thought Diane Abbott said. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2256850/How-feminism-blame-breakdown-family-Left-winger-Diane-Abbott.html  is what the Mail thought she said. What she really did say about feminism  in her own words : "As a feminist, perhaps we have been ambivalent about families. In the 1980s, we used to say: 'A woman without a man is like a fish without a bicycle.' The more academic version was: 'The family is the site of women's oppression.' So those of us who came of age at the height of feminism had very mixed views about the family, since it seemed to be defined as a heterosexual thing with a certificate, children and mum at home." Subtext: "Feminists regard marriage and family as oppression and despise women who are housewives and stay-at-home mothers." "The days of your mum living next door are over, due ...