The Lily-Livered Libertarian Philip Booth of the Institute of Economic Affairs

Philip Booth - the lily-livered libertarian who let the side down because he was afraid of  Dame Jenni, Grand Matriarch of Britain
http://www.iea.org.uk/biographies/philip-booth





"A report out today says British women are facing a shockingly high price for motherhood as they are forced into lower skilled, part-time work after having children. Joining Jenni are Vidhya Alakeson from the Resolution Foundation and author of report out today, and Professor Philip Booth, an economist and director at the Institute of Economic Affairs."

http://www.iea.org.uk/in-the-media/media-coverage/part-time-work-is-a-matter-of-free-choice

My thoughts as I heard Philip Booth on Woman's Hour.   (Do men who go on Woman's Hour become women while they speak, I wonder.)

"Child care costs have rocketed", says Philip. "Extraordinarily expensive even after subsidies," he went on to say.

Oh come on, Philip, SAY IT, SAY IT, SAY IT, say that mothers with young children should not be working.

Why train women to be engineers if they are just going to take maternity leave and inconvenience their employers? Employers might as well hire men who can afford to support their wives to stay at home looking after their children without sending them out to work.

Nope. He didn't say it. Philip didn't say it at all. Why are British men such incorrigible PUSSIES?

I wonder why Philip didn't suggest repealing the Equality Act.

Does he think he might be sacked from his part-time job at Brighton University then, if he dared to say anything as HERETICAL and libertarian as that?

Would Dame Jenni have given him the same treatment as she meted out to poor Oliver James when he suggested that working mothers might harm the development of their young children?


Perhaps he was afraid of being told off by Dame Jenni because he is a frightened little boy rather than a man who is supposedly a libertarian with a message to give to the Grande Dame Matriarch that is Dame Jenni. 

Most white liberal middle class men are the perfect illustration of the term "lily-livered". 

The awful thing is that they actually feel no shame about their cowardice and you can't get them to do anything. Libertarian men, especially, really are beyond contempt.

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2011/04/tweeters-who-have-stopped-me-from.html is a list of tweeters who have blocked me from following their tweets.  Quite a few of them are libertarian men, eg Tim Aker, Simon Richards, Guido Fawkes, James Delingpole.

Did they do that because of my BNP associations (I haven't got a racist bone in my body unless wanting to help the white working classes is racist) or because I have dared to challenge the Matriarchy and they fear guilt by association?

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The 30 second rapist

http://www.australian-news.com.au/anti_male.htm "Perth resident Kevin Ibbs was having consensual sex with Christine Watson on the night of 29 November 1986. Watson, a close friend of Ibbs's wife, Katrina Carter, was living in the same house with Ibbs and Carter. The sex act was taking place with the full knowledge of Carter who was in the house at the time. As Ibbs was nearing ejaculation, Watson suddenly withdrew her consent to sex (so she later claimed) and tried to push Ibbs away. He continued for a short time. Too late, he was trapped. He was charged with sexual assault and found guilty under the new law. The judge found that Ibbs had continued sexual intercourse for about thirty seconds without consent (for which he was later dubbed the 30-second rapist). The judge sentenced him to four years imprisonment." http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/HCA/1987/46.html "Some years later Watson admitted to police that the whole incident was a set-up orchestrated b...
Read more

My interpretation of that wife-beating verse 4:34

Image
004.034 YUSUFALI: Men are the protectors and maintainers of women, because Allah has given the one more (strength) than the other, and because they support them from their means. Therefore the righteous women are devoutly obedient, and guard in (the husband's) absence what Allah would have them guard. As to those women on whose part ye fear disloyalty and ill-conduct, admonish them (first), (Next), refuse to share their beds, (And last) beat them (lightly); but if they return to obedience, seek not against them Means (of annoyance): For Allah is Most High, great (above you all). PICKTHAL: Men are in charge of women, because Allah hath made the one of them to excel the other, and because they spend of their property (for the support of women). So good women are the obedient, guarding in secret that which Allah hath guarded. As for those from whom ye fear rebellion, admonish them and banish them to beds apart, and scourge them. Then if they obey you, seek not a wa...
Read more

Verse in Koran implicitly accepts the existence of brothels

024.033 YUSUFALI : Let those who find not the wherewithal for marriage keep themselves chaste, until Allah gives them means out of His grace. And if any of your slaves ask for a deed in writing (to enable them to earn their freedom for a certain sum), give them such a deed if ye know any good in them: yea, give them something yourselves out of the means which Allah has given to you. But force not your maids to prostitution when they desire chastity, in order that ye may make a gain in the goods of this life. But if anyone compels them, yet, after such compulsion, is Allah, Oft-Forgiving, Most Merciful (to them), PICKTHAL : And let those who cannot find a match keep chaste till Allah give them independence by His grace. And such of your slaves as seek a writing (of emancipation), write it for them if ye are aware of aught of good in them, and bestow upon them of the wealth of Allah which He hath bestowed upon you. Force not your slave-girls to whoredom that ye ...
Read more