Religion and War

Religion or God is a weapon of war rather than a cause of war.

Comments

Leos Tomicek said…
True, the conflict between Israel and Arabs started as a fight between secular Zionists and Arab Nationalists. The Hamas and Orthodox Jewish settlers came later.
3 July 2010 at 01:17
Anonymous said…
Wow, you are so perceptive. Noone has ever said anything like that before, what made you write it?

Are you studying GCSE history?

Jo.
3 July 2010 at 06:26
Claire Khaw said…
Jo, there are plenty of atheists who religiously believe that God is a *cause* of war. I am just pointing out the error of this.
3 July 2010 at 08:12
Anonymous said…
Only stupid ones. Greed is the cause of war.
3 July 2010 at 10:27
Claire Khaw said…
Most wars are stupid. The invasion of Iraq and Afghanistan was stupid and nothing to do with God.

It was caused by the unquestioning support of Israel by the US and the UK.

Bin Laden himself said so.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,137095,00.html

"Your security is not in the hands of Kerry, Bush or Al Qaeda. Your security is in your own hands," bin Laden said, referring to the president and his Democratic opponent. "Any state that does not mess with our security, has naturally guaranteed its own security."

Admitting for the first time that he ordered the Sept. 11 attacks, bin Laden said he did so because of injustices against the Lebanese and Palestinians by Israel and the United States.
4 July 2010 at 07:01
Anonymous said…
Only stupid people...not wars(wars being stupid is a given). Besides I would have thought you would support war, surely it's a swift culling of the less able in society, young people who couldn't get any other job. Civil war is something many of your ideas would invoke, suppression of women, ruthless treatment of the poor and needy, removing compassion, these are the consequences of public flogging, capital punishment and the like. If you inject cruelty in an otherwise moral nation what you will get is an uncomfortable line that many would find difficult to tread.
4 July 2010 at 08:19
Claire Khaw said…
Revolution or war (foreign or civil) is inevitable if the nation is badly governed.

A revolution or a civil war is an act of national defecation or vomiting.

Not pretty, but necessary in the long run.
5 July 2010 at 11:55
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

So Cameron is now officially a promoter of Mumsnet? His take on children with SENs

http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2009/nov/20/cameron-tory-government-promote-mumsnet Well, at least he is making noises to the effect that he is not too happy about these older mothers with their Down's Syndrome and autistic children (which they like boasting about) shoving their children in mainstream schools, suing the school for their very own special adult to pick up after them and follow them around, slowing things down for everyone.  If your kind is a retard then just send it to a School for Children with SENs, even if you think this might "stigmatise" it rather than drag us all down, you selfish bitches.  The teachers hate it too, because they are not trained to deal with your retard with its behavioural problems when there are already so many "normal" kids with behavioural problems.  http://www.senlegal.co.uk shows that suing your school to give your specially needier child a special carer and special privileges has now become a legal specialisa...
Read more

The 30 second rapist

http://www.australian-news.com.au/anti_male.htm "Perth resident Kevin Ibbs was having consensual sex with Christine Watson on the night of 29 November 1986. Watson, a close friend of Ibbs's wife, Katrina Carter, was living in the same house with Ibbs and Carter. The sex act was taking place with the full knowledge of Carter who was in the house at the time. As Ibbs was nearing ejaculation, Watson suddenly withdrew her consent to sex (so she later claimed) and tried to push Ibbs away. He continued for a short time. Too late, he was trapped. He was charged with sexual assault and found guilty under the new law. The judge found that Ibbs had continued sexual intercourse for about thirty seconds without consent (for which he was later dubbed the 30-second rapist). The judge sentenced him to four years imprisonment." http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/HCA/1987/46.html "Some years later Watson admitted to police that the whole incident was a set-up orchestrated b...
Read more

That wife-beating verse again

Among the most contentious verses of the Qur’an is 34, of the fourth surah, which concerns women, their rights, obligations, justice ,and marriage laws. Common and popular  translations of Surah 4:34 are as follows:  Men are the protectors and maintainers of women, because Allah has given the one more (strength) than the other, and because they support them from their means. Therefore the righteous women are devoutly obedient, and guard in (the husband's) absence what Allah would have them guard. As to those women on whose part ye fear disloyalty and ill-conduct*, admonish them (first), (next) refuse to share their beds, (and last) beat them** (lightly); but if they return to obedience, seek not against them means (of annoyance): For Allah is Most High, great (above you all). -  (Abdullah Yusuf Ali) Men are in charge of women, because Allah hath made the one of them to excel the other, and because they spend of their property (for the support of ...
Read more