The Battlefield of Love

Another seminal (pun intended) book on the destructiveness of feminism, which dates national decline back to the Sex Discrimination Act 1975. Very readable and makes its points clearly. Any woman who wonders where all the decent men have gone will know that they lie buried after extermination in the mass grave of feminism. Instead of limiting the supply of sex only to marriageable men (thus incentivising them to behave decently), men and women have been behaving like promiscuous constantly copulating gay men but with the additional disadvantage of producing offspring that have the effect of lowering the quality of the national gene pool. So that is why Andromeda seeks Perseus in vain. The Age of Heroes is well and truly over. Anne Phillips disagrees at http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/books/reviews/the-miseducation-of-women-by-james-tooley-641100.html She says: " Tooley is probably right that young women are drinking too much chardonnay, and no doubt right that ma...

Andrew Slade, whose marital status is uncertain, emailed me this day: I came across this MS poem in a National Trust House at the weekend; attributed 2 Jane Taylor (1783-1824) "The Lavenham poetess". But it might as well b entitled "The Disillusioned Husband", written at the height of the Age of Romanticism: unrealistic expectations unrealised! Please post it under my real name, THE DISILLUSIONED BRIDE The twentieth week is well-nigh past, Since first in Church we two were asked: Oh! Would we had not gone at last. =My husband. Thy kindness has a fainter blow, I see thee daily cooler grow, How canst thou bear to serve me so? =My husband. And when sometimes thou wouldst fulfill Some little office for me still, Thy love now seconds not thy will. =My husband. Safely thou showest a tyrant's heart, For Hymen's thread with cruel art Hath bound us so we must not part. =My husband. Thy unpolite expressions seem With no affection now to team And never are my charms...

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-1167826/Want-chat-chap-Cut-small-talk-say-scientists.html So, men are so frightened and clueless now that they cannot respond to subtle female signs of interest and encouragement unless it is something as unambiguous as "Fancy dinner?" "Can I give you my number?" "Do you have plans later?" "What are you up to tonight?" "Your place or mine?" So it's official then. British men now secretly want to dress like women and sit around in bars looking "new-manly" while waiting for women to chat them up. Their pretty fluffy little heads are now incapable of dealing with such things as ambiguity, risk of rejection and the basics of male courtship that even lower animals know they must perform if they desire the opportunity to sexually reproduce. I wonder if the problem is anything to do with the fact that most British women are now so "liberated" that they think being promiscuo...

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009/apr/02/taliban-pakistan-justice-women-flogging It is NOT in the Koran that you are to be lashed for merely being in a position to commit adultery. It must have been the case that pre-Islam, the Afghans would flog each other over trifling matters such as dropping litter and subsequently adapted Islam to their customs. I repeat, there is nothing in the Koran that says "flog a woman 34 times for putting herself in a position where she could have committed adultery". It does however say in the Koran that 100 lashes are to be administered for convicted adulterers and 80 lashes for falsely accusing someone of adultery. Under such a system, I would argue that victims of adultery be personally allowed to administer these punishments in the privacy of the bedchamber . I know for a fact that quite a fetish is made of discipline and the sex industry caters very well for this preference in men such as sir Max Mosley. I do not doubt that quite a few wo...

Visit http://www.thewomanwhisperer.co.uk/ listen to sample chapter, and leave your comment here! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j7Z2gKT7B6Y continues this theme, but is entirely unrelated to the DVD and its originator.

http://musliminstitute.org/article.php?id=1249 This seems fair enough to me. Marriage is business after all! Those of you who have had an expensive divorce (Are you reading this, John Cleese and Roman Abramovich?), read the following and marvel at the fairness and commonsense of these principles. According to Islamic law, marriage is the most sacred commitment in life between two adults of opposite sex. It attempts to save it wherever possible. As a consequence divorce is regarded by Allah as the most ‘hated thing’. However, breakdown in marriage does take place for a variety of reasons. If the divorce is initiated by husband he has to pay the woman any Mahr [the price paid to the bride - think of golden handcuffs and you will get the idea!] that remains unpaid. If the divorce is initiated by the wife, and the husband is found to be at fault by the arbiters she does not lose her Mahr. But if she cannot prove his fault, she has to return to her husband whatever...

http://www.tomharris.org.uk/2009/03/04/the-return-of-morality/ WHEN Carolyn was in hospital, having just delivered us of wee Reggie, a very young girl in the bed opposite was also celebrating the arrival of her newborn. As was her proud father, who made great play to anyone who might have been listening (me) of how proud he was of his daughter. She was, I guess, about 16. I don’t think he should have been ashamed. And it’s great that this young girl had such a loving dad to support her. But proud? Proud that his teenage daughter was not only sexually active but was now a mother? Proud that any chance of a decent education, followed by a decent job, was now remote at best? Proud that she was, in all likelihood, about to embark on a lifetime of depending on benefit handouts for her and her child? I’m a Labour MP, so some will undoubtedly be surprised, and shocked that I’m writing this. But I can no longer pretend that the army of teenage mothers living off the state is anything other tha...