tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-440967410082699790.post1615677080115968866..comments2023-12-13T23:04:18.876+00:00Comments on The Battlefield of Love: 23 Reasons for repealing the Sex Discrimination Act 1975Claire Khawhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11557436240917008429noreply@blogger.comBlogger23125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-440967410082699790.post-41688997869033123702010-08-01T12:49:51.587+01:002010-08-01T12:49:51.587+01:00If you take things back to women not having the vo...If you take things back to women not having the vote (which hardly matters in a plutocratic oligarchy, anyway) you will find that men without property did not have the vote, either. Feminism is class blind garbage and very much 'on the run'...Rookh Kshatriyahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05970184074924214959noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-440967410082699790.post-55043337427266616552010-07-06T01:19:28.448+01:002010-07-06T01:19:28.448+01:00Indeed we are a species of two sexes.Indeed we are a species of two sexes.Leos Tomicekhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08642791882622432741noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-440967410082699790.post-75460589717911716702010-07-05T19:39:49.691+01:002010-07-05T19:39:49.691+01:00What an illogical statement. If things have chang...What an illogical statement. If things have changed for women then they will have changed correspondingly for men too. Women's empowerment comes at the price of men's emasculation. <br /><br />Do you really want to live in a society that wastes men's talents and confines them to uselessness, criminality and unemployment?<br /><br />It would appear that feminism is the ideology that is happy to squander the lives and talents of men and ruthlessly sacrifice the quality of the next generation so women can have the freedom to work, which most don't want anyway. That is why it is both stupid and evil.Claire Khawhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11557436240917008429noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-440967410082699790.post-47634832036241197362010-07-05T17:19:00.670+01:002010-07-05T17:19:00.670+01:00Leos, it's a certainty (or you and this Khaw w...Leos, it's a certainty (or you and this Khaw women wouldn't bother writing) that things have changed much more for women than men, with or without wealth. Hence FEMINISM.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-440967410082699790.post-50794125116963704522010-07-05T15:44:34.623+01:002010-07-05T15:44:34.623+01:00Woman of wealth?
You must be kidding. What about ...Woman of wealth?<br /><br />You must be kidding. What about the vast numbers of men of no wealth? Did they have a voice?Leos Tomicekhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08642791882622432741noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-440967410082699790.post-20364872648084944442010-07-05T11:58:00.103+01:002010-07-05T11:58:00.103+01:00"You want no Nanny state with nanny state ide..."You want no Nanny state with nanny state ideals."<br /><br />How so?<br /><br />"Sex discrimination is not thought crime. It's the act of discrimination, the evidence of discrimination can only be seen in action."<br /><br />We are forbidden to act on our opinions.<br /><br />Discrimination requires thought, does it not?Claire Khawhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11557436240917008429noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-440967410082699790.post-9758279946067292222010-07-05T10:52:21.091+01:002010-07-05T10:52:21.091+01:00A lot of my Facebook friends are my detractors. A...A lot of my Facebook friends are my detractors. As you say, a lot of them are very stupid.Claire Khawhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11557436240917008429noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-440967410082699790.post-50562470152283474212010-07-05T10:31:35.750+01:002010-07-05T10:31:35.750+01:00I have. 'Friends' is a very loose term. ...I have. 'Friends' is a very loose term. Most things on facebook about you are negative, in fact two groups have existed that can't stand you. Apparently you invite politicians, who never refuse anyone, fake celebrities and stupid people to be your friends. And then there are people who become your 'friend' to oppose you. <br /><br />I failed to spot anyone 'on your side' and clever.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-440967410082699790.post-89543144228677895482010-07-05T08:10:54.565+01:002010-07-05T08:10:54.565+01:00You should check out my Facebook friends list.You should check out my Facebook friends list.Claire Khawhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11557436240917008429noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-440967410082699790.post-46738990763400169632010-07-05T07:46:07.896+01:002010-07-05T07:46:07.896+01:00You seem to mix with many stupid people.
And by ...You seem to mix with many stupid people. <br /><br />And by 'voice' I don't simply mean the odd author, woman of wealth, I am speaking of a general and blanket right to be heard. Educating women, giving then property rights....<br /><br /><br />So obtuse.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-440967410082699790.post-61389430257058609612010-07-04T23:33:02.312+01:002010-07-04T23:33:02.312+01:00@ Sonja Buyers
If you love women you should join ...@ Sonja Buyers<br /><br />If you love women you should join ranks with us, libertarians and anti-feminists. Feminism also hurt women.<br /><br />Speaking of your vision of the past where women were not articulate and essentially voiceless. This is a myth, pick up any 19th century novel written by a woman.Leos Tomicekhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08642791882622432741noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-440967410082699790.post-33354303129164791242010-07-04T22:29:53.578+01:002010-07-04T22:29:53.578+01:00Let me make this quite clear: I would not disenfra...Let me make this quite clear: I would not disenfranchise women because they are women. Any citizen who pays a minimum of tax ought to have the vote. <br /><br />Most women, probably because they are happy not to vote, and because they won't be paying taxes because they are wives and mothers, will in practice not vote. <br /><br />The awful truth is that women aren't much interested in politics and use the fact that they are women to excuse their political ignorance and apathy. <br /><br />Indeed, I know a female friend who did exactly that. "I am girl," she said, "what do you expect?"<br /><br />Women and men are not equally good at doing certain things. <br /><br />Only the unnatural and truth-denying ideology of feminism would wish to make an issue out of this biological fact.Claire Khawhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11557436240917008429noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-440967410082699790.post-20153519785860189222010-07-04T18:33:40.666+01:002010-07-04T18:33:40.666+01:00I'm talking about feminism, Claire, not your s...I'm talking about feminism, Claire, not your silly repeal ideas. You are an anti feminist, which if you take it back far enough would leave you without a vote.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-440967410082699790.post-21254533236406703462010-07-04T18:24:59.852+01:002010-07-04T18:24:59.852+01:00There were universities for women before the Sex D...There were universities for women before the Sex Discrimination Act 1975 and also freedom of expression.Claire Khawhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11557436240917008429noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-440967410082699790.post-2736514035305399912010-07-04T17:52:03.674+01:002010-07-04T17:52:03.674+01:00It's easy to be an already educated and establ...It's easy to be an already educated and established woman hating women and being anti feminist, afte rall if the feminists hadn't altered the society in which you live you wouldn't have a voice loud enough or articulate enough to be heard. <br /><br />Perhaps you should be thanking the feminists for allowing you to spout these ideas.<br /><br />Sonja Buyers.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-440967410082699790.post-6920190118783969972010-07-04T08:24:13.269+01:002010-07-04T08:24:13.269+01:00What a waste of time repealing the law then if not...What a waste of time repealing the law then if nothing happens as a consequence. Your arguments do not flow and meet anywhere. You want no Nanny state with nanny state ideals. Sex discrimination is not thought crime. It's the act of discrimination, the evidence of discrimination can only be seen in action. <br /><br />CLV.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-440967410082699790.post-13818290453680453022010-07-04T07:24:07.542+01:002010-07-04T07:24:07.542+01:00CLV, being a libertarian, I am against all totalit...CLV, being a libertarian, I am against all totalitarian anti-discrimination thoughtcrime legislation, which I believe is an evil imposition against the principle of freedom of contract. <br /><br />What do you think is going to happen anyway?<br /><br />Employers will just give the job to people they think is the best person for the job.Claire Khawhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11557436240917008429noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-440967410082699790.post-3419485189626712202010-07-04T07:18:42.234+01:002010-07-04T07:18:42.234+01:00CLV, I am a libertarian and in favour of freedom o...CLV, I am a libertarian and in favour of freedom of contract. If I want it for myself, I must give it to others.<br /><br />What a shame most people don't realise that all anti-discrimination legislation is *thoughtcrime*.Claire Khawhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11557436240917008429noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-440967410082699790.post-24004430611120183112010-07-03T17:39:30.268+01:002010-07-03T17:39:30.268+01:00@ Villier's
If it's pointless, why even ...@ Villier's <br /><br />If it's pointless, why even bother with us?Leos Tomicekhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08642791882622432741noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-440967410082699790.post-28883302080504184252010-07-03T12:53:42.073+01:002010-07-03T12:53:42.073+01:00You wish to repeal the sex discrimination act and ...You wish to repeal the sex discrimination act and so you wish to be discriminated against. Or is this yet another mindless proposal of yours with no thought of the consequences?<br /><br />CLV.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-440967410082699790.post-24323252940598218682010-07-03T08:14:07.727+01:002010-07-03T08:14:07.727+01:00What are the laws I propose which would penalise m...What are the laws I propose which would penalise me? List them, please, C L Villiers.Claire Khawhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11557436240917008429noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-440967410082699790.post-44106693100049752542010-07-03T06:33:04.643+01:002010-07-03T06:33:04.643+01:00Hilarious, the internet is full of self promoting ...Hilarious, the internet is full of self promoting useless commentators who know little about the crap they peddle. Thank goodness that noone is paid good money for this. Claire I understood you were a woman so why would you wish for laws that would penalise you? I guess the worst kind of woman hater is your kind. <br />Pointless trying to educate you or Leos.<br /><br />C.L.VilliersAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-440967410082699790.post-37121056267464139362010-07-03T01:15:33.972+01:002010-07-03T01:15:33.972+01:00Number 10 is typical. They like lecturing anyone. ...Number 10 is typical. They like lecturing anyone. I have heard numerous times, when I raised objections against the Afghan war, that the Taliban discriminated against women. So I guess in their logic we have to fight a pointless war for the sake of Afghan women.<br /><br />WTF?<br /><br />If they honestly think that women in Afghanistan will be 'freed' by intervention, they should stop dreaming. The NATO forces are incapable of even eradicating the drug production there, how able would they be dealing with centuries old cultural traditions?Leos Tomicekhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08642791882622432741noreply@blogger.com